2025.04.01的單邊違法，是今天的協議違法？

【雙魚之論】

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to implement broad, independent tariffs, thereby ruling that Trump's "tariff" declaration is illegal. However, this should refer to the facts as of April 1, 2025.
Now, the tariffs implemented by the United States with various countries are (bilateral) "agreements", not (unilateral) "international emergency economic powers". In other words, the "administrative decision" of April 1, 2025 has been transformed or is in the process of transformation, and it is not necessarily the "political decision" of IEEPA implemented on February 21, 2026.
Only countries that ignore Trump and continue to maintain tariffs under (unilateral) "international emergency economic powers" (possibly such as China, or countries that have not completed negotiations) apply to the past facts referred to in the Supreme Court judgment.
If so, are these people "acting"? Or will this action by the judges resolve the CCP's dilemma?

美國最高法院裁定：〈國際緊急經濟權力法（IEEPA）〉並未授權總統實施廣泛、獨立的關稅，從而裁定川普的「關稅」宣告違法。但，這應該是指2025.04.01的事實。
現在，美國與各國實施的關稅是（雙邊）「協議」，不是（單邊）的「國際緊急經濟權力」。換言之，2025.04.01的「行政決定」已經轉換或轉換中，不一定是2026.02.21實施的IEEPA的「政治決定」。
只剩下不理會川普，一直維持（單邊）「國際緊急經濟權力」下的關稅的國家（可能如中國，或未完成談判的國家）適用最高法院判決所指涉的過去事實。
假使如此，這些人在「演戲」嗎？或者，法官此舉會解決中共的困境？

https://www.facebook.com/share/1EMNxQThmY/?mibextid=wwXIfr