網頁

2025-05-23

邪惡,以校園自治為名隱藏在大學校園

【雙魚之論】英文拷到 G / D 找中文翻譯
Looking at Taiwan’s post-war history, campuses have often been celebrated as bastions of student protection and freedom, standing firm against state oppression. This legacy has become a benchmark for the progress of democratic liberties. In Taiwan’s democratized era, society cherishes this value deeply. Yet, under the banner of “university autonomy,” some actions cross the line, undermining Taiwan’s interests—such as Tsinghua University’s overly intimate exchanges with China.
Worse still, communist states and terrorism exploits the openness of democratic nations, lurking within campuses to build networks, manipulate perceptions, or develop physical and psychological weapons, posing a direct threat to national security.
America’s elite universities, mostly privately founded, boast immense wealth but are hamstrung by donor-restricted funds, limiting their financial flexibility. Even prestigious institutions like Harvard rely heavily on federal subsidies, granting the government significant leverage over private schools. It’s likely that Harvard will ultimately comply, handing over student conduct records for scrutiny by national security agencies and university officials to determine compliance with U.S. laws.
Should Harvard defy the White House to the end, other institutions would struggle to absorb such a large influx of students, leaving many international students facing disrupted studies. Every nation, however, accepts elite international students with a strategic aim: to extend its political, economic, and cultural influence abroad. Campuses are, after all, tools of national policy. Many Harvard international students hail from prominent families in their home countries, and it’s not uncommon for elite schools to quietly ease their path to graduation. For a long time, Taiwan has seen many such international students enter the political arena, where their performance has often been disappointing.
Thus, when these institutions invoke “campus autonomy” to resist government policy, their stance often rings hollow and impotent.
This is truly a dilemma with no easy resolution.

從戰後台灣歷史觀之,校園作為保護學生與自由、對抗國家暴力的堡壘,常被譽為佳話,更成為衡量民主自由發展的標竿。台灣民主化後,社會尤為珍視此價值。然而,某些以「大學自治」為名的行為,卻逾越界限,損及台灣利益,例如清華大學與中國的過度密切交流,便引發爭議。
更甚者,共產國家與恐怖主義常利用民主國家的開放特性,潛伏於校園,暗中發展組織、操縱認知,甚至竊取或研發物理與心理武器,威脅國家安全。
美國頂尖學府多由私人創辦,雖坐擁雄厚財力,但捐款多有指定用途,資金運用受限,難以靈活調度。即便是哈佛這類菁英學府,亦高度依賴聯邦補助,致使政府對私立學校擁有不容忽視的影響力。可以預見,哈佛最終將被迫提交學生操行紀錄,供國安單位與校方共同審查是否違反國家法令。
若哈佛選擇與白宮抗衡到底,其他學府難以短時間內吸納如此龐大的學生群體,許多留學生恐將被迫中斷學業。然而,任何國家接納菁英留學生,皆旨在擴展其對他國政治、經濟與文化的影響力,校園本就是國家政策的工具之一。哈佛的留學生多出身本國顯赫家族,菁英學府甚至不乏「放水」畢業的案例。長期以來,台灣也很多這樣的留學生在政壇,其表現令人搖頭。
因此,這些學府以「校園自治」為旗幟對抗政府政策,實則力有未逮,顯得蒼白無力
這無疑是一場進退維谷的兩難困局!

美政府取消哈佛招外籍生資格 6800名學生須轉學或離境    自由 20250523

美國國川普政府22撤銷哈佛大學招收國際學生的資格,指控該校允許「反美、支持恐怖份子的煽動者」攻擊猶太學生,並與中國共產黨合作。此舉為華府與這所頂尖學府間不斷升級的衝突投下震撼彈。

《美聯社》報導,國土安全部稱,哈佛將無法再招收新的外籍學生,現有近6800名外籍生也必須轉學或離境,否則將失去合法身分,並指哈佛最晚至2024年仍培訓中國準軍事組織成員。哈佛大學駁斥此舉為非法報復,將對學術研究造成嚴重傷害,並表示正為受影響學生提供指引。哈佛外籍生佔總數逾4分之1

川普政府與哈佛的衝突,自哈佛違抗白宮改革指令後便不斷加劇。白宮批評哈佛是自由主義與反猶主義溫床,已削減26億美元聯邦補助,川普更揚言取消其免稅資格

此次行動源於國土安全部長諾姆(Kristi Noem4月的要求,她命哈佛提交可能涉及暴力或抗議並可能遭驅逐的外籍學生資訊。諾姆稱此制裁因哈佛「未能遵守基本報告要求」,禁止其2025-26學年招收國際學生。但若哈佛72小時內提交相關紀錄,包括影音資料,便可能恢復資格。

諾姆強調:「本屆政府正追究哈佛助長暴力、反猶主義及與中共合作的責任。」此行動撤銷了哈佛在「學生與交換學者計畫(SEVP」中的認證。

哈佛校長賈伯(Alan Garber)本月稍早表示,校方已進行治理改革,包含打擊反猶主義,但不會放棄「受法律保護的核心原則」,且無證據顯示外籍生更滋事。哈佛民主黨學生組織批評此為「教科書式威權主義」。言論自由團體「個人權利與表達基金會(FIRE」則譴責此為「監控國家」的地毯式調查。

許多針對哈佛的懲處來自聯邦反猶太主義工作小組,指哈佛未能保護猶太學生。國土安全部也引用哈佛內部報告佐證校園歧視,並重提國會對大學與中國聯繫的擔憂,稱哈佛2024年仍為新疆生產建設兵團提供培訓,哈佛表示將回覆國會。

美國教育委員會主席米契爾(Ted Mitchell)稱此舉「非法、心胸狹隘」,憂慮將對國際學生產生寒蟬效應。川普政府已多次利用SEVP系統打壓高等教育,曾遭法院挑戰。

沒有留言:

張貼留言

請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行