The one,
now 74, tries to extend his limited term for another five years.
The one,
now 79, who has got the third term will wish to the fourth term.
The one,
now 84, who is in his fourth term, will think: why bother? The restriction of
the term is nothing but a man-made issue.
Why should I, a rule-maker, follow the rules? “I am the party, I am the state” is what it
is.
The one
then chooses to maintain his power till the last day of his physical life, a
genuine self-proclaimed monarch.
The point
is becoming: what will he do during the extension of the infinite terms?
Would he
create an achievement that no one has ever done at the risk of his power, or
would he prefer to be at the top rank with the least political risk?
That is a
Shakespeare-style question “to be, or not to be.”
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行