【縛雞之見】
香港律政司司長鄭若驊周五接受BBC中文採訪時說:「從頭到尾,國家安全都是中央的事情,從來不是香港自治範圍的事。人大常委會立法,是合情合理合憲。」
對於英國將放寬香港的英國國民海外護照(BNO)持有人簽證逗留期限,她與北京立場並不一致,她認為英國有權力就BNO政策決定其做法。中國外交部此前表示,英方的做法「違背承諾」和「違反國際法」。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-52865816
The UK’s granting Hongkongers who hold the passport of the British National Overseas citizenship is not true, at least for now.
A practical scenario for the UK is granting them a one-year trip right
among others, which caused fury from Beijing.
But if the UK does grant citizenship, then there are three hundred
thousand UK citizens overnight, besides the 33-thousand UK citizens today,
which will be a vital problem to the UK because the latter has a legal
responsibility to protect a huge number of the refugees.
Hongkongers
with BN(O) passports could get British citizenship if Beijing imposes national
security law, Dominic Raab says SCMP
20200528
- About 300,000
people hold the passports, which were issued to Hongkongers born before the 1997 handover
- Six-month limit for UK visits to be revoked,
work and study will be allowed and a pathway to citizenship will be added,
British foreign secretary says
Hongkongers with BN(O) passports will be able
to obtain British citizenship if China
enforces the national security laws in the city, the British government announced on
Thursday, marking a dramatic shift to London’s long-held policy.
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab and Home Secretary Priti Patel made the
move on the day China’s top legislature, the National People’s Congress,
announced the decision to impose national security legislation on the former British colony.
British National (Overseas) passports were issued to Hongkongers born before
the 1997 handover, and under current rules, passport
holders can visit the UK for up for six months but cannot work or apply for
citizenship. As of December, 300,000 Hongkongers held a BN(O) passport.
Raab said Britain was now ready to change
this rule.
“If China continues down this path and
implements this national security legislation we will change that status, and
we will remove that six-month limit and allow those BN(O) passport holders to
come to the UK and to apply to work and study for extendable periods of 12
months, and that would itself provide a pathway to future citizenship,” Raab
told reporters.
“In the meantime we urge China to step back from the brink and live up to
its responsibilities as a leading member of the international community,” he
added.
“Deeply concerned at China’s proposals for legislation related to
national security in Hong Kong,” the home secretary, who is responsible for
immigration issues, wrote on Twitter. “If imposed, @DominicRaab & I will
explore options for a path to citizenship for BNO passport holders.”
Johnny Patterson, director of the London-based Hong Kong Watch group,
said the British government should be prepared to take more action for
Hongkongers.
“If things deteriorate further, the UK will need to consider extending
the scheme beyond 12 months, up to and including right of abode, and encourage
other international partners to create a lifeboat scheme to ensure all
Hongkongers, including those born after 1997, have a lifeline,” Patterson said.
The change in British policy came a day after US Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo declared that Hong Kong no longer enjoyed a high degree of autonomy as
promised by Beijing.
Until now, Britain – plagued by an anti-immigrant sentiment that led to
the referendum that resulted in Brexit – was reluctant to grant BN(O) holders
full citizenship.
Hongkongers now living in Britain said they saw several “devils in the
detail” from Raab's statement.
Apart from not applying to those born after the handover – which makes up
a sizeable portion of frontline protesters in Hong Kong – Raab’s assurance also
falls short of an immediate recognition of citizenship.
It appears that the British government is reluctant to offer guarantees
of an indefinite right to stay, with details lacking on the conditions for the
yearly renewals, such as whether the applicant would need to meet a financial threshold.
It is also unclear how long a BN(O) holder would need to stay in order to
start the citizenship application process.
The fact that the Conservative Party controls the majority of the House
of Commons makes it likely that a bill changing BN(O) status will win
sufficient support.
“This is a fantastic news and a great credit to” Raab and Patel, said
Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the Parliament’s foreign affairs
committee. “Some of us have been calling for it for a while. Now we need to go
further and recognise the full rights of British nationals.”
轉貼看著~e。
回覆刪除周布雅:香港難民問題不用吵了,這個300萬港人申請免簽證居留的權力是1997年以前就有的,只是中英聯合聲明之後在中國基於單一國籍制之下要求英國廢止的,強生拿出來其實就是以彼之矛攻彼之盾,你們中國不遵守中英聯合聲明了,那麼我們英國也不需要再守約了
有能力來台灣的香港人就肯定有能力去英國,大不了來了台灣之後再轉機去英國,台灣再怎樣不惜代價出血也不可能拿出比英國更好的條件,假如以難民身份來台灣之後是只能住在難民特區、沒有工作權所以錢用光之後就只能靠救濟維持生活、沒有政治權所以理論上是不能參與政治活動、也沒有投票跟參選權力,假如跟英國能給予的條件相對比之後還是選擇要來台灣當難民,那我覺得懷疑他的動機也是合理的
但是這些都是假議題,就好像中國喜歡用開戰逼人談判可是其實自己根本沒有做好戰爭準備,他們單純就是賭你不願意冒戰爭風險會退讓一樣,強生是不是真的打算大規模放出簽證我認為也是存疑,他更可能是賭中國不敢承受這麼大的損失,假如香港真的一半的人都出逃,帶走的人才跟金錢是中國絕對沒有能力彌補的,拋售資產造成的金融風暴也是現在的中國無力承受,那麼經濟損失不下於毀掉半個珠海貿易區,就算這些人大部分只是申請了簽證之後繼續在香港生活,那麼那些人你敢不敢像內地的中國人一樣想動就動?如果不敢那一國一制就變成國際笑話
可以預見的就是中國不會放人、不可能放人、不敢放人,就算放人走,來台灣的待遇也遠遠不如去英國,所以我不懂現在見縫插針吵著台灣必須馬上跟中國翻臉,不然就是人類罪的人是在吵什麼?