U.S. States
and the China Competition SECRETARY
POMPEO 20200208
Thank you, Governor Hogan, Governor Cuomo. Nice to see you.
It’s great to be here with you all. I was watching basketball on my phone
on the way in – Auburn 91, LSU 90 – and I – it’s a final in overtime. Yes,
exactly. I was reminded – you said I’m the 70th Secretary of State. It always
reminds me President Trump is the 45th President of the United States, so there
is a lot more turnover in my gig than there is in his. (Laughter.) So it’s good
to be with you today.
I do want to thank Governor Hogan and the vice chair, Governor Cuomo, and
everyone else here at NGA for hosting me here today.
It’s a hard act to follow, following the President’s State of the Union
address the other night. I have no medals of freedom to distribute here today.
Nor am I passing out copies, so you can’t tear them up when I’m done.
(Laughter.)
I’ve gotten to know some of you as I’ve traveled throughout the states.
I’ve probably traveled inside the country more than many secretaries of state.
It’s something they usually don’t do as much. I think it’s important that the
American people understand what our diplomats are doing around the world and
why we’re doing it.
So I just wanted to mention that if you see me in your state, I’m not
lost. Your state has not seceded from the union. I know where I am.
Although I know there are some folks in California who are clamoring for
“Calexit,” so President Newsom, I look forward to working with Secretary of
State Feinstein when that comes to be. (Laughter.)
I can get away with California jokes. I grew up in southern California.
My dad still lives in the same house I grew up in in Orange County. It’s a
wonderful place.
Last year, I received an invitation to an event that promised to be,
quote, “an occasion for exclusive deal-making.” It said, quote, “the
opportunities for mutually beneficial economic development between China and
our individual states [are] tremendous,” end of quote.
Deal-making sounds like it might have come from President Trump, but the
invitation was actually from a former governor.
I was being invited to the U.S.-China Governors’ Collaboration Summit.
It was an event co-hosted by the National Governors Association and
something called the Chinese People’s Association
For Friendship and Foreign Countries. Sounds pretty harmless.
What the invitation did not say is that the group – the group I just
mentioned – is the public face of the Chinese
Communist Party’s official foreign influence agency, the United Front Work Department.
Now, I was lucky. I was familiar with that
organization from my time as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
But it got me thinking.
How many of you made the link between that group and
Chinese Communist Party officials?
What if you made a new friend while you were at that event?
What if your new friend asked you for introductions
to other politically connected and powerful people?
What if your new friend offered to invest big money
in your state, perhaps in your pension, in industries sensitive to our national
security?
These
aren’t hypotheticals. These
scenarios are all too true, and they impact
American foreign policy significantly.
Indeed, last year, a Chinese Government-backed think tank in Beijing
produced a report that assessed all 50 of
America’s governors on their attitudes towards China. They labeled
each of you “friendly,” “hardline,” or “ambiguous.”
I’ll let you decide where you think you belong. Someone in China already
has. Many of you, indeed, in that report are
referenced by name.
So here’s the lesson: The lesson is that competition
with China is not just a federal issue. It’s why I wanted to be here
today, Governor Hogan. It’s happening in your states with consequences for our
foreign policy, for the citizens that reside in your states, and indeed, for each of you.
And, in fact, whether you are viewed by the CCP as friendly or hardline,
know that it’s working you, know that it’s working the team around you.
Competition with China is happening inside of
your state, and it
affects our capacity to perform America’s vital national security functions.
I want to set the context today for this topic.
At the end of the Cold War, America started to engage with China heavily. It made good sense. We thought that the
more we interacted, the more it would become like a liberal democracy, like us
here in the United States.
It
didn’t happen, and you all know this.
Indeed, under Xi Jinping, the country is moving exactly in the opposite direction
– more repression, more unfair competition, more predatory economic practices;
indeed, a more aggressive military posture as well.
You should know this doesn’t mean we can’t do business with China. I had
an operation when I ran Century International. We had a small office in
Shanghai. We can find places to cooperate when our interests converge.
You can see that in the first part of the trade deal that President Trump
got done, signed last month.
We’re happy about that. It was the right thing to do. That was indeed a
deal that was good for both the United States and China. And these economic
ties are powerful. They’re important and good. They’re good for your state;
they’re good for America.
Look at the nearly 18 tons of medical
supplies the United States just flew to China this past week to help
fight the coronavirus. Yesterday we announced more
than $100 million in assistance to China and the countries that are
affected by that virus.
And on that note, too, I want to take just a moment to note I want to
send my condolences to the loved ones of the United States citizen who fell
victim to the coronavirus in Wuhan over the last days.
But while there are places we can cooperate, we
can’t ignore China’s actions and strategic intentions. If we do, we
risk the important components of our relationship that benefit both countries.
The
Chinese Government has been methodical in the way it’s analyzed our system, our
very open system, one that we’re deeply proud of. It’s assessed our vulnerabilities, and it’s decided to
exploit our freedoms to gain advantage over us at the federal level, the state
level, and the local level.
Last year, I announced that I would give a series of speeches on China,
and this is part of that. It’s the context in which state and local government
officials ought to think about the way they lead with respect to our
relationship. It’s important. China matters.
It’s been part of my mission at the State Department to mobilize all
parts of the United States Government. I was out in Silicon Valley a couple
weeks ago to talk to America’s leading tech companies about this very set of
issues.
And I need your help, too.
What China does in Topeka and Sacramento reverberates in Washington, in
Beijing, and far beyond. Competition with China
is happening. It’s happening in your state.
In fact, I would be surprised if most of you in the audience have not
been lobbied by the Chinese Communist Party directly.
Chinese Communist Party friendship organizations like the one that I
referenced earlier are in Richmond; Minneapolis;
Portland; Jupiter, Florida; and many other cities around the country.
But sometimes China’s activities aren’t quite that public, and I want to
talk about some of that today. Let me read you an excerpt of a letter from a
Chinese diplomat. It was China’s Consul General in
New York sent a letter last month to the speaker of one of your state
legislatures.
Here’s what the letter said in part. It said, quote, “As we all know, Taiwan is part of China… avoid
engaging in any official contact with Taiwan, including sending
congratulatory messages to the electeds, introducing bills and proclamations
for the election, sending officials and representatives to attend the
inauguration ceremony, and inviting officials in Taiwan to visit the United
States.” End of quote from the letter.
Think about that. You had a diplomat from China assigned here to the
United States, a representative of the Chinese Communist Party in New York
City, sending an official letter urging that an
American elected official shouldn’t exercise his right to freedom of speech.
Let that sink in for just a minute.
And this isn’t a one-off event. It’s happening all across the country.
Chinese
consulates in New York, in Illinois, in Texas,
and two in California, bound by the diplomatic
responsibilities and rights of the Vienna Convention, are very politically
active at the state level, as is the embassy right here in Washington, D.C.
Maybe some of you have heard about the time when the
Chinese consulate paid the UC-San Diego students to protest the Dalai Lama.
Or last August, when former governor Phil Bryant of Mississippi received
a letter from a diplomat in the consul’s office in Houston, threatening to cancel a Chinese investment if the
governor chose to travel to Taiwan. Phil went anyway.
Last year, a high school – a high school, a
high school in Chicago – disinvited a Taiwanese representative to serve on a climate panel after Chinese pressure.
It’s one thing to pressure the Secretary of State of the United States of
America. It seems quite something else to go after
a high school principal. It shows depth. It shows systemization. It shows
intent.
Chinese Communist Party officials, too, are cultivating relationships
with county school board members and local politicians – often through what are
known as sister cities programs.
Look, this Chinese competition is something you all know. It sits in the back of your mind. But you have
many duties and you are busy people. But this
competition is well underway. And while
these might seem like local matters to some, the cumulative effect is of
enormous national importance and international significance.
Of course, too, our public educational
institutions are another arena of competition with China.
I know, governors, you don’t run these institutions on a day-to-day basis,
but you often have impact on the people that do. The FBI director and I think
the Attorney General, too, talked yesterday about something called the “Thousand Talents Plan.” It’s a plan to recruit
scientists and professors to transfer the know-how
we have here to China in exchange for enormous paydays.
The program has probably targeted campuses in your state. Indeed, the Department of Justice has indicted professors in my
home state at the University of Kansas and at Virginia Tech and at Harvard.
A Texas A&M investigation reportedly discovered more than 100 academics participating in Chinese talent
recruitment plans. Only five of them had declared that they were
participating in this program.
And goodness knows what else we have not
discovered.
There are indeed very credible reports of Chinese
Government officials pressuring Chinese students – students studying
right here in the United States of America – to
monitor fellow Chinese students and to report back to Beijing.
One very prominent pro-democracy Chinese student on a college campus in
the Northeast last year received death threats – death
threats for exercising his right to free speech. The FBI became involved.
Make no mistake about it: We want talented, young Chinese students to
come study in the United States of America. I see it at Wichita State
University. These are wonderful young people. We ought to encourage them to be
here. But they shouldn’t have to fear the long
arm of Beijing, which often reaches out via groups like the Chinese Students and Scholars Association.
Look, that’s just one of many campus groups directly influenced by the
Chinese Communist Party and its representatives right here in the United
States.
Many of you are familiar with Confucius Institutes. Confucius Institutes
purport to have the sole purpose of teaching Mandarin language skills and
Chinese culture. A bipartisan Senate committee found last year in 2019 that the Chinese Communist Party controls nearly every aspect
of the Confucius Institutes’ activities here in the United States.
Over the past few months, the University of Missouri, the University of
Kansas, the University of Maryland have independently decided to close down
their Confucius Institutes after conducting their own reviews, and schools in
22 other states are doing or have already done the same.
Sadly, China’s propaganda campaign starts even earlier than college.
China has targeted K through 12 schools through its “Confucius Classrooms,” the
CCP’s program to influence kids at elementary,
middle, and high schools around the world.
Do you know that we have no ability to establish similar programs in
China? I’m sure that doesn’t surprise you. President Trump has talked about
reciprocity in trade. We should have reciprocity
in all things. Today they have free
rein in our system, and we’re completely shut out from theirs.
As of 2017, there were 519 of these classrooms in the United States. Beijing knows that today’s kids are tomorrow’s leaders.
The China competition is happening. It’s happening in your states, and
it’s a competition that goes to the very basic
freedoms that every one of us values.
And when it comes to doing business, I’m
asking you to adopt a cautious mindset. In the words of President
Reagan, when you’re approached for an introduction or a connection to a deal,
trust but verify.
I know you all have power over pension
funds or the people that run them. As of its latest public filing,
the Florida Retirement System is invested in a company that in turn is invested
in surveillance gear that the Chinese Communist
Party uses to track more than 1 million Muslim minorities. California’s pension fund, the largest public pension
fund in the country, is invested in companies that supply the People’s
Liberation Army that puts our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines at risk.
And it is the case for many Chinese companies, too – no Sarbanes-Oxley.
Their books are not wide open, so it’s difficult to know if the transaction
that’s being engaged in is transparent and fair and follows the rule of law.
Now, all of these things may well be legal. But the
question is: Do they demonstrate good judgment and preserve America’s
national security?
I want to urge vigilance on the local level, too. In the District of
Columbia, there have been concerns raised that the
new Metro cards manufactured by China could be vulnerable to cyber threats.
So again, it’s worth trusting but
verifying. There are federal officials prepared to help you work
your way through these challenges when they arise. Don’t
make separate individual deals and agreements with China that undermine our
national policy. I know none of you would do so intentionally. Let us help you make sure we’re getting it right.
We’re here to help. The Trump administration wants to help. There are so
many things we have already done.
Last year, we issued a letter to state governments.
It reaffirmed that Taiwan remains a key business partner and a friend in
every other way.
We have strengthened the review process for
Chinese companies that are investing in your states.
We have revoked visas for so-called “research
scholars” who abused their privileges by teaching in Confucius Classrooms,
and made sure that they departed the United States.
We’ve banned scientists from the Department
of Energy, which overseas America’s 17
largest national – excuse me, nuke labs, including our nuclear research
facility in New Mexico. We did so because
they were participating in Chinese talent recruitment programs.
We have directed two Chinese propaganda outlets, the Chinese Global
Television Network and Xinhua News Agency, to register as foreign agents.
And we at the State Department have started to require Chinese diplomats
to apply – comply with the same rules we comply
with when we’re in China. Chinese
diplomats now must notify the State Department in advance of official meetings
with state and local officials.
They must declare their official
visits to U.S. educational and research institutions as well.
This is just fairness, reciprocity, basic
common sense. This is not an onerous restriction to put on China.
Look, I know it’s 2:30 on a Saturday afternoon. There are lots of good
things we could do. I hope you will all take on board what I’ve said today.
You all have important missions leading your states. These are complex,
difficult jobs. You have the task to create jobs and opportunity in your state
for your people, attract human capital, investment that undergirds our
prosperity.
It’s a tough job, and you get curveballs every day from all across the
place.
But don’t lose sight of the competition
from China that’s already present in your state. Let’s all rise to
the occasion and protect our security, our economy; indeed, all that we hold
dear, all of those freedoms.
It’s what leaders must do.
It’s what we do as Americans.
I hope God will bless each and every one of you, each of your states, and
the United States of America.
嗯.....這次算第二次提醒了....雖然我也在懷疑中國對自己的內部軍事能力 有沒有在這波疫情詳細調查過 但中國軍隊的軍事部署的確正在慢慢往東岸部署 這在太空中看是很清楚的.....= =
回覆刪除美國方面大概等川普要求的調查完 如果他決定公開病毒來源的確切證據(如果他決定不公佈.....那又可能另當別論,不過還有中國狗急跳不跳牆的問題....)
那麼 差不多可以宣佈 第三次世界大戰 以這次的生化危機為開端 大概要正式開打了......= =
其實,科學界大概結論出來了:非自然、基因重組過的病毒。
刪除不敢講的是,「他們」幹的!
不知道的是,如何流出?以及,為何流出?
沒有開發解藥,就開發生物武器。
這算什麼科學家?
算什麼軍人?
但,卻是不折不扣的中國共產黨人。