〈生物武器法案〉起草者Francis Boyle 博士說：冠狀病毒是生物武器 Dr. Francis Boyle Creator Of BioWeapons Act Says Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon India Research Wing 20200203 Taimocracy翻譯

【縛雞之見】

感謝網友hoxloflang5的分享。

〈生物武器法案〉起草者Francis Boyle 博士說：冠狀病毒是生物武器

Dr. Francis Boyle Creator Of BioWeapons Act Says Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon    India Research Wing 20200203  Taimocracy翻譯

In an explosive interview Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act has given a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.

起草了《生物武器法》的弗朗西斯·博伊爾（Francis Boyle）博士在一次爆炸性採訪中發表了一份詳細聲明，承認：2019年武漢冠狀病毒是一種攻擊性的生物戰武器，世界衛生組織（WHO）已經對此有所了解。

Francis Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.

Francis Boyle是伊利諾伊大學法學院的國際法教授。他為《生物武器公約》起草了美國國內實施立法，該公約被稱為1989年《生物武器反恐法》，該法獲得了美國國會兩院的一致通過，並由喬治布希總統簽署成為法律。

In an exclusive interview given to Geopolitics and Empire, Dr. Boyle discusses the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China and the Biosafety Level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. He believes the virus is potentially lethal and an offensive biological warfare weapon or dual-use biowarfare weapons agent genetically modified with gain of function properties, which is why the Chinese government originally tried to cover it up and is now taking drastic measures to contain it. The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.

在對地緣政治和帝國進行的獨家採訪中，Francis Boyle博士討論了在中國武漢發生的冠狀病毒爆發，以及他認為傳染病得以倖免的生物安全4級實驗室（BSL-4）。他認為：這種病毒具有潛在的致命性，是一種具有功能特性的轉基因生物進攻性武器或兩用生物戰武器劑，這就是中國政府最初試圖掩蓋這種病毒，現在正採取嚴厲措施加以遏制的原因。武漢BSL-4實驗室還是世界衛生組織（WHO）專門指定的研究實驗室，Boyle博士認為，世衛組織完全了解正在發生的事情。

Dr. Boyle also touches upon GreatGameIndia‘s exclusive report Coronavirus Bioweapon – where we reported in detail how Chinese Biowarfare agents working at the Canadian lab in Winnipeg were involved in the smuggling of Coronavirus to Wuhan’s lab from where it is believed to have been leaked.

Boyle博士還談到了GreatGameIndia的獨家報告《冠狀病毒生物武器》。在該報告中，我們詳細報導了在加拿大溫尼伯的加拿大實驗室工作的中國生物戰間諜，如何將冠狀病毒走私到武漢的實驗室，據信這是從那裡洩漏出來的。

Dr. Boyle’s position is in stark contrast to the mainstream media’s narrative of the virus being originated from the seafood market, which is increasingly being questioned by many experts.

Boyle博士的立場與主流媒體對這種病毒起源於海鮮市場的說法形成鮮明對比，後者正日益受到許多專家的質疑。

Recently, American Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas also dismantled the mainstream media’s claim on Thursday that pinned the coronavirus outbreak on a market selling dead and live animals.

最近，阿肯色州的美國參議員Tom Cotton週四批駁了主流媒體的說法，該說法將冠狀病毒的爆發固定在出售死活動物的市場上。

In a video accompanying his post, Cotton explained that the Wuhan wet market (which Cotton incorrectly referred to as a seafood market) has been shown by experts to not be the source of the deadly contagion.

Cotton參議員在其陪同職位的一段影片中解釋：專家們已經證明武漢濕貨市場（Cotton參議員誤以為真的是海鮮市場）並不是致命的傳染源。

Cotton referenced a Lancet study which showed that many of the first cases of the novel coronavirus, including patient zero, had no connection to the wet market — devastatingly undermining mainstream media’s claim.

Cotton參議員引用了《刺胳針》雜誌的一項研究，該研究表明，新型新型冠狀病毒的首批病例，包括零號患者，與濕貨市場無關，這嚴重破壞了主流媒體的說法。

“As one epidemiologist said: ‘That virus went into the seafood market before it came out of the seafood market.’  We still don’t know where it originated,” Cotton said.

棉花說：「正如一位流行病學家所說：『該病毒在從海鮮市場出來之前就進入了海鮮市場。』我們仍然不知道它的起源。」

“I would note that Wuhan also has China’s only bio-safety level four super laboratory that works with the world’s most deadly pathogens to include, yes, coronavirus.”

「我要指出，武漢還擁有中國唯一的第四級生物安全超級實驗室，該實驗室可處理世界上最致命的病原體，包括冠狀病毒。」

Such concerns have also been raised by J.R. Nyquist, the well known author of the books “Origins of the Fourth World War” and “The Fool and His Enemy,” as well as co-author of “The New Tactics of Global War”.  In his insightful article he published secret speechs given to high-level Communist Party cadres by Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian explaining a long-range plan for ensuring a Chinese national renaissance – the catalyst for which would be China’s secret plan to weaponiz viruses.

著名的《第四次世界大戰的起源》和《愚人與他的敵人》一書的作者J.R. Nyquist，以及《全球戰爭的新策略》的合著者，也提出了這樣的擔憂。在他有見地的文章中，他發表了中國國防部長遲浩田將軍給共產黨高層幹部的秘密演講，解釋了確保中國民族復興的長遠計劃，而這一計劃的催化劑將是中國對將病毒當成武器的秘密計劃。

Nyquist gave three different data points for making his case in analyzing Coronavirus. He writes:

Nyquist在分析冠狀病毒時給出了三個不同的數據點。 他寫：

The third data point worth considering: the journal GreatGameIndia has published a piece titled “Coronavirus Bioweapon – How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It.”

第三個值得考慮的數據點：GreatGameIndia雜誌發表了一篇題為〈冠狀病毒生物武器–中國如何從加拿大偷走冠狀病毒並將其武器化〉的文章。

The authors were clever enough to put Khan’s Virology Journal article together with news of a security breach by Chinese nationals at the Canadian (P4) National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, where the novel coronavirus was allegedly stored with other lethal organisms.  Last May, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were called in to investigate; by late July the Chinese were kicked out of the facility.  The chief Chinese scientist (Dr. Xiangguo Qiu) was allegedly making trips between Winnipeg and Wuhan.

作者很聰明地將Khan的《病毒學雜誌》的文章，與中國國民在溫尼伯的加拿大國家微生物實驗室（P4）違反安全性的消息放在一起，據稱這種新型冠狀病毒與其他致死性生物一起儲存。去年五月，加拿大皇家騎警被召入調查。到7月下旬，這位中國人被趕出了實驗室。據稱，中國首席科學家邱向國博士在溫尼伯和武漢之間旅行。

Here we have a plausible theory of the NCoV organism’s travels: first discovered in Saudi Arabia, then studied in Canada from whence it was stolen by a Chinese scientist and brought to Wuhan.  Like the statement of Taiwan’s intelligence chief in 2008, the GreatGameIndia story has come under intensive attack. Whatever the truth, the fact of proximity and the unlikelihood of mutation must figure into our calculations.

在這裡，我們對N-CoV生物的傳播有一個合理的理論：首先在沙烏地阿拉伯發現，然後在加拿大進行研究，當時中國科學家將其偷走並帶到了武漢。就像2008年台灣情報局長的話一樣，GreatGameIndia的故事也受到了強烈的抨擊。不管真相如何，我們都必須考慮到鄰近性和變異的可能性。

It’s highly probable that the 2019-nCoV organism is a weaponized version of the NCoV discovered by Saudi doctors in 2012.

2019-nCoV生物，很可能是沙烏地醫生在2012年發現的NCoV的武器版本。

Meanwhile, the mainstream media’s narrative still maintains that the origin of the 2019 Coronavirus is the Wuhan Seafood Market. After GreatGameIndia published the story on Coronavirus Bioweapon – not only were our databse tinkered with and our reports blocked by Facebook on the flimsy reason that they could not find GreatGameIndia Facebook page, but the report itself was viciously attacked by Foreign Policy magazine, PolitiFact (known widely as Facebook’s propaganda arm) and BuzzFeedNews.

同時，主流媒體的說法仍然堅持認為，2019年冠狀病毒的起源是武漢海鮮市場。在GreatGameIndia在冠狀病毒生物武器上發表該報導之後–不僅因為我們無法找到GreatGameIndia Facebook頁面的脆弱原因，我們的數據庫被修補，並且我們的報告被Facebook封鎖，而且該報告本身也受到《外交政策》雜誌PolitiFact的惡意攻擊（眾所周知 廣泛用作Facebook的宣傳部門）和BuzzFeedNews。

It is not GreatGameIndia alone which is being viciously attacked.  Zero Hedge, a popular alternate media blog was suspended by Twitter for publishing a story related to a study by Indian scientists finding 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus to be not naturally evolved, raising the possibility of it being created in a lab.  Shockingly, the study itself came under intense online criticism by Social Media experts resulting in the scientists withdrawing the paper.

受到惡意攻擊的不僅是GreatGameIndia。一家備受歡迎的替代媒體博客《零對沖》因發布與印度科學家的一項研究有關的故事而被Twitter停職，該研究發現2019年武漢冠狀病毒不是自然進化的，這增加了它在實驗室中創建的可能性。令人震驚的是，這項研究本身遭到了社交媒體專家的強烈網上批評，導致科學家撤回了該論文。