【Comment】
The existence of Taiwan and its democracy threatens Beijing’s “one-party
state” is losing its legitimacy.
That is why it is extremely important for all the people thinking
policies and choosing leaders wisely to protect our democracy firmly.
因為台灣的民主,所以北京的極權統治正當性站不住腳。
Hong Kong
showed China is a threat to democracy. Now Europe must defend Taiwan Anders Fogh
Rasmussen@The Guardian 20190716
Beijing is bullying another democratic neighbour. The EU must stop ignoring authoritarianism for
the sake of stability and cash
Hong Kong’s administration has backed down over the controversial
extradition bill, but the canary in the coalmine of
China’s tacit acceptance of democracy is already dead.
Under China’s “one country, two systems” model, Hong Kong was given the
guarantee that the freedoms of its citizens would be preserved and respected. Meanwhile, for a
long time in the west, the consensus was that, as its economy grew, China would
start to look more like Hong Kong. Regrettably, in recent years the opposite has
happened and Hong Kong looks more like China by the year. Perhaps we were
naive to believe that this erosion of Hong Kong’s democracy was not inevitable.
Beijing
makes no secret of its view that democracy and Chinese civilisation are
incompatible. The protesters
in the streets of Hong Kong would beg to differ, and I hope they succeed
through peaceful means.
For democracy activists in Hong Kong and beyond, there is a shining city
on the hill: Taiwan. It is the one clear example of a Chinese
liberal democratic project that has thrived in recent years. It should come as no surprise that it has
faced intense pressure from Beijing.
In the South China Sea, China is strengthening its military presence. Its violations of Taiwanese air and sea space
have escalated to dangerous levels. Beijing’s hostility towards Taipei has intensified since
2016, when Taiwan elected a president who defends Taipei’s sovereignty. It has stepped up its aerial missions
violating Taiwanese airspace, sailing warships near or in Taiwanese waters,
with the most recent example in June when China’s aircraft carrier passed
through the Taiwan Strait. Taipei is also seriously concerned about Chinese
interference in Taiwan’s presidential election next January.
To date, Europe has been erratic in its dealings with China. Several states have been eager to jump into
bed with Beijing and auction off our democratic
values for the promise of a boost in investment. They have turned a blind eye to Beijing’s
human rights abuses at home and bellicosity in its neighbourhood. Meanwhile, other states see China’s continued
authoritarian drift but shrink in the face of its global bullying.
The European Union regularly argues that its foreign
policy is based on values, not just short-term interests. If this is the case, we should stand up for
these values and defend the largest Chinese democracy from authoritarian
pressure. The United
States is leading by example, including the recent decision to sell military
equipment worth more than $2bn to Taipei.
In Europe, however, China bullies capitals into accepting its warped
viewpoint that Taiwan is just a rebel province. It forces us to
deny Taiwan’s access to international forums and feigns outrage if any European
politicians meet democratically elected representatives of the Taiwanese people
– a country with a population almost equal to that of Australia.
The new EU leadership should change this approach,
and make a stand for democratic self-determination. It should start
by meeting Taiwan’s leaders, and moving forward with an investment partnership;
and it should no longer be silent when China takes an aggressive posture. Until we do, the
EU’s claims to be basing foreign policy on values is a statement that rings
hollow.
Our defence of democracy abroad matters for our
security at home. Europe’s current debates around China relate
to potential security threats – from questions about Huawei and its role in
building 5G, through to Chinese one-way investment in Europe’s strategic crown
jewels. We want China to offer
opportunity and be a partner, but its nationalistic
shift gives us cause to worry about its real motives, underpinned by a totally
different set of values.
This is why Europe’s stand for our values matters. It is not some abstract discussion about what
happens halfway around the world, but the maintenance of a rules-based global
order which has kept relative peace, spread prosperity and built free
societies.
The people of Hong Kong want more democracy. They will have to win it for themselves. But Europe cannot
continue turning the other cheek for the sake of stability and Chinese cash,
while people seek the rights that we insist on for ourselves. Yes, China is rich
and powerful, but it will only rewrite the world’s rulebook if we allow it to –
starting by dismantling democracy on its own doorstep.
We should stand up for Taiwan’s self-determination and treat it as a
fully-fledged member of the alliance of democracies. In a globally interdependent world, failure to defend our values in east Asia and beyond will
eventually lead to the erosion of those same values at home.
• Anders Fogh
Rasmussen was Nato secretary general from 2009-2014 and prime minister
of Denmark from 2001-2009.
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行