【Comment】
至20151218，12：00，此現任國務院高階官員訪問，並未見諸外交部與總統府網站。
華特‧道格拉斯 (Walter Douglas) 來台○梅健華(2015.12.18)
歡迎我的同事東亞及太平洋事務局副助理國務卿華特‧道格拉斯 (Walter Douglas) 來台。他這兩天造訪台北及高雄，瞭解我們在台灣的互動與交流。華特的職責包括非常廣泛，包括公共宣傳、教育、文化交流以及策略規劃。我們很高興能有他在這裡協助深化美台關係。--- 梅健華#FromAITDirector
"A big welcome to my colleague Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
Walter Douglas, who is in Taipei and Kaohsiung for the next couple of days to
learn more about our engagement with Taiwan. Walter
has a very broad range of responsibilities, including public outreach,
education and cultural exchanges, and strategic planning. We’re glad to have him
here to help strengthen the U.S.-Taiwan relationship…km
這似乎有點詭異,這麼高階官員來到,台灣的"政府"都沒有訊息!!
回覆刪除似乎是「唯一代理權」的喪失。
刪除對照馬朱大賣黨產，思之過半。
只有眷村老悲悲，一輩子被騙。
被第一代、第二代、第三代連續騙。
可憐！
莫非沒有拜訪外交部跟總統府?直接來台視察業務~
回覆刪除中國流亡難民集團就要離開台灣了!結束了七十年以來代替美國軍事政府在台灣的治理!USMG就要將台灣的治理權!交給台灣民政府TCG來接管了! 信不信大家就拭目以待吧！
回覆刪除不要腦筋不清楚被一兩人誤導，從而誤導社會了！
刪除台灣民政府是self-claimed的。
美國政府或United Nations的授權文件在哪裡呢？
只是拍張國務院辦公室或酒會的照片，這麼隨便？
會比王如玄都不如？
以前曾經聽說過，這個組織是中國所扶植，其目的是要把台獨搞爛、搞成詐騙集團... 對照聽說中國政府扶植一些怪怪的宗教在台灣大肆發展，並藉此影響政治，所謂曾經在香港運用過的"中國白蟻"做法，顯然也在台灣用上了
刪除台灣民政府的日屬論最荒誕!
刪除民政府概念分明來自軍事占領的法理，卻擺脫美國、回歸日本。
以國力差異、地理位置、以及中國人狂熱的國族主義，向日本要回台灣完成統一，確實是比較可行。
TCG is a juku 「塾」, PERIOD.
刪除During the Edo period, juku 「塾」 used to mean a school established at the home of a scholar. Those scholars took in students to whom they taught either Japanese studies, or the Teachings of Confucius, Western studies, medicine and martial arts. Jukus「塾」of the Bakumatsu (幕末) era played a major role in the transition to Meiji Restoration. Jukus in the tradition of the Edo period are incubators for things to come.
To fulfill its mission as a juku 「塾」, TCG is motivating the brainwashed offspring of the Kominka generation (皇民化の世代) to shed the shackles of slavish identification to the Chinese occupier. Do you deem yourselves Chinese? Then attacking TCG makes sense. But coming from the offspring of the Kominka generation?. . . . Such shallowness is disappointing. It will serve you well when you are invaded and dragged to a laogai.
「塾」，這個概念，我可以接受，實際上也需要。
刪除我的朋友都知道，這就是這些年來我對TCG一直不發言的原因——它總有一些教育與宣傳的功勞。
不過，當連學者開始以TCG「錯誤的推論」為本，進行「不必要或也是錯誤的評論」，那就開始走精了。
大大第二段的you，應該不是特別指稱本人的吧？
我會把它當成一種泛稱（複數）。
當，日本在國際條約上宣示「放棄」台灣，為何還能推出「台灣屬於日本」的結論？
台日「可以也應該」友好，可是「回不去了」！
當，在TRA上，台灣已經有了一個「統治當局」(TGA)而這TGA明白指稱是1979以前的ROC時，TCG的正當性從何而來？
授權書在哪裡？
頒授典禮何時舉行？
當對此質疑，希望獲得解釋（以使理論更完備）時，不希望有人率爾推論「質疑者是中國人」(Do you deem yourselves Chinese?)
再問一句：此疑問與勞改何關？
很好笑喔! 自己是Chinese, 反而指著別人的鼻子說別人是Chinese。不當皇民的台灣人就是中國人? 台灣民政府的邏輯真的很瞎!
刪除@Hoon Ting's 2015/12/21 comment
刪除「塾」，這個概念，我可以接受，實際上也需要。我的朋友都知道，這就是這些年來我對TCG一直不發言的原因——它總有一些教育與宣傳的功勞。
Great minds always know to concur on what really matters.
不過，當連學者開始以TCG「錯誤的推論」為本，進行「不必要或也是錯誤的評論」，那就開始走精了。
Does that includes me? Is that me you are writing about? Make it self-appointed “armchair activist”, you’ll get closer.
大大第二段的you，應該不是特別指稱本人的吧？我會把它當成一種泛稱（複數）。
You are correct. Here, "You" = the brainwashed, bamboozled offspring of the Kominka generation (皇民化の世代) . I did some editing before posting, though. What I had been reading really aggravated me.
And that leads us to 當對此質疑，希望獲得解釋（以使理論更完備）時，不希望有人率爾推論「質疑者是中國人」(Do you deem yourselves Chinese?) 再問一句：此疑問與勞改何關？
Can I plead guilty? Although I had edited my post, I eventually lost it and allowed myself to be carried away.
However, on a territory of the Empire of Japan, — even making allowance for the mainstream opinion that Taiwan was a colony of Japan — where Japan left such foot-print, why are not we using the Japanese language? That is but one of my pet peeves with Taiwan.
希望在2016台灣總統大選前，梅處長能促成更多（美國高官）來台，如：美國總統歐巴馬先生.或副總統.參眾議員.....，如果總統無法來台灣，起碼於2016台灣總統選舉前，應發表類似言論：「支持台灣以民主方式，加入聯合國，反對任何國家以武器威脅或暴力威脅的方式，干涉任何國家的「民主自決」......」，發表這樣的說詞，才是一個世界（領頭羊總統）的份量及高度 。
回覆刪除這是社會運動的跳躍憧憬
刪除不是外交手法！
蠻同意雲程兄的說法。
刪除我自己進入行政體系後，才明瞭物理學上所稱，微小的移動，看似平衡，卻是最小能量的路徑積分。
從日本政權到蔣介石民國政權，台灣人只有短短8年的行政領導權經驗。我們需要學習「領導政權」的語言。
看看中國的從滿清到中華民國的革命，為何清帝退位後不是革命黨人主政，而是袁世凱等人。
聽到一隻小鳥吱吱說，「民政府＋剩餘主權日屬論」的開山掌門始祖 林志生 大統領主席，業已閉關神隱遁行於某方囉！是否過神仙生活？小鳥並沒有提及。
回覆刪除Roger
刪除證件獲美國、聯合國承認 揭台灣民政府神秘面紗
刪除http://www.nownews.com/n/2015/12/25/1934999
刪除汪集團的溢美啊～～
有意思
汪集團的報導說，沒有募款
刪除這這這～～
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoUVLESJjdw
@Hoon Ting's 2015/12/21 comment - 2/3
回覆刪除當，日本在國際條約上宣示「放棄」台灣，為何還能推出「台灣屬於日本」的結論？
台日「可以也應該」友好，可是「回不去了」！
Japan (日本國) here means a brand new, independent state. Call it the “made-in occupied Japan” 1947 model (型、タイプ). That Japan had been “liberated” in late August, early September 1945. On September 8, 1951, that “liberated” 1947 model of Japan was declared “road-worthy” by a US-led assembly of nations.
Yamato Japan was first “liberated” like Taiwan or Korea. Next, Japan is a newly independent state born out of the occupation and utter destruction of the mother state. Such new state can not claim title to Taiwan, a territory of the mother state, the Empire of Great-Japan (大日本帝国). Japan (日本國) is the butterfly, and Taiwan has been vegetating for the last seventy years among the remains of its chrysalis.
When construing the present interim status of Taiwan in that light, the offspring of the Kominka generation are entitled to assume (deem) themselves hereditary subjects of the Japanese Crown and nationals of the Empire of Great-Japan (大日本帝国). Their ultimate allegiance is to the Japanese Crown and the normalization of status of sovereignty of Taiwan ultimately conjoins Yamato Japan and Taiwan in a form or another under the Imperial Crown of Japan.
I envision a loose form of political union modeled after that which attaches the Bailiwick of Jersey (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey) to the British Crown. Although the road to fruition will be long and arduous.
Taiwan will enjoy a state of its own, in right of the Japanese Crown. It will be able to trade independently of Yamato Japan. However, Its diplomacy and security will be subsumed to that of Japan. To serve in the military, natives of Taiwan will join the Japanese military.
I favor this vision because it satisfies my urge to see Taiwan strong again as an inclusion of a strong Japan. The normalization of the status of sovereignty of Taiwan also promotes normalization of the international status of Japan.
The role of the Emperor and the rules of engagement of Japanese forces are proving major stumbling blocks to the normalization of the nation of Japan under its 1947 “made-in-occupied-Japan” constitution. Opinion-makers in conservative circles in Japan are ineffectually chewing their cud over the issue.
But would they care about Taiwan instead of focusing exclusively on Japan in an hostile environment, they might also procure a new angle for discussing those two issues.
As I love to say at every opportunity I have, my own interest and even my ties to Japan are “made-in occupied, martial law Taiwan.”