【Comment】
什麼都沒變,但輕鬆證實國務卿見過台灣官員。
CMarie Harf Senior Advisor for Strategic Communications
Daily Press Briefing
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
June 5, 2015
June 5, 2015
QUESTION: Change of subject. Yesterday,
the Taiwanese DPP presidential candidate came to
State Department to visit Deputy Secretary Blinken. D o you have any readout? And because it didn’t happen before, does this
mean that U.S. Government has adjust its policy
guideline to interact with the Taiwanese Government or politician?
MS HARF: Well, we – our position has not changed. We appreciate
that Democratic Progressive Party chairwoman visited here. We had constructive exchange on a wide range of
issues with her. Our policy has not changed. From time to time, we
do meet with Taiwanese officials; certainly the Secretary has, and others
have as well.
QUESTION: But not in this building. So
--
MS HARF: I’m not sure that’s true, actually. I’m happy to go back and check.
QUESTION: Okay. Please.
MS HARF: We do – we have met –
I know that – before. And I’m happy to check
where those meetings took place. But our position in no way has changed on Taiwan.
Yes.
QUESTION: A follow-up on that. How do you respond to the Chinese Government’s
call that the meeting is sending the wrong signal to Taiwan?
MS HARF: Well, again, our policy hasn’t changed. We have developed a strong
unofficial relationship with Taiwan.
This is based on the One China policy, the three
joint communiques, the Taiwan Relations Act – things we’ve talked about for
years and years and years now. So really
there’s been no change in our policy here.
QUESTION: Are you --
QUESTION: Is there --
MS HARF: Go ahead.
QUESTION: Are you confident of the
peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait in coming years?
MS HARF: Well, we certainly have
an abiding interest in peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and that is certainly
something we’ve encouraged both officials
in Beijing and Taipei to continue their efforts that support cross-strait stability.
QUESTION: How would you characterize
Chairman Tsai’s meeting here with the different officials?
MS HARF: Well, as I just said,
we had a constructive exchange on a wide range
of issues with her.
QUESTION: Marie, regardless of whether
or not the policy has or hasn’t changed – and you say it hasn’t, so --
MS HARF: It hasn’t.
QUESTION: Exactly. But you must’ve realized that having this kind
of a meeting in this building was going to raise the ire of the Chinese, no?
MS HARF: Matt, I’m not sure I have
much more to say on this. We have an unofficial
and a strong unofficial relationship with Taiwan and this
is just part of that unofficial relationship.
QUESTION: I understand that, but
you know how sensitive the Chinese are about this issue, which is why for decades
the guidance on Taiwan always has the three communiques, the Taiwan Relations Act,
and the One China policy --
MS HARF: And it will long after
I’m gone from this podium, I’m sure.
QUESTION: -- which is – exactly,
and which is why in every single meeting that you have – that the secretaries of
state have with the Chinese, this goes – is gone through in rote form. That said – given that, wasn’t there any kind of
an awareness that a meeting with a Taiwanese official in this building was going
to cause some angst?
MS HARF: I’m not sure this – we
see this as different from other meetings we’ve had with Taiwanese officials in
this unofficial relationship we have, so I’m happy to check and see if there’s more
to say on this.
QUESTION: Put it a slightly different
way: There’s nothing in the communiques or the other documents that were just referenced
here that prevent the United States from conducting meetings in this building or
elsewhere with Taiwanese officials, correct?
MS HARF: No, correct. That is correct. And we’ve done so for a long time.
Said, yes.
QUESTION: Can we move to another
topic? Today marks the 48th anniversary --
MS HARF: I think there’s – hold
on. One more.
QUESTION: Right. Marie, in your
recollection, when is the last time a Taiwanese
official or a
presidential hopeful was meeting with the State Department official at
this building?
MS HARF: At this building? I’m happy to check. I know we’ve had many meetings with Taiwanese officials
in a variety of places that we’ve talked about publicly. I’m happy to check on that.
Said.
QUESTION: I have --
QUESTION: Did she meet --
MS HARF: I think we’re going to
move on. I don’t have much more to say.
QUESTION: The same question. Same question.
MS HARF: Okay. Yeah. I --
QUESTION: So did she meet with the
Deputy Secretary Antony Blinken yesterday?
MS HARF: I’m not going to confirm the details of her
meetings here.
Yes.
QUESTION: Marie, just – I realize
this is harping on this, but it’s --
MS HARF: Why would the last day
be any different?
QUESTION: Exactly. But I mean, look
--
QUESTION: You did start on time.
That suggested --
MS HARF: I know.
QUESTION: -- redemption for all
sinners, so --
MS HARF: Aren’t you proud of me
today? (Laughter.) I was actually ready like five minutes early. I was just hanging
out back there.
QUESTION: Punctuality. The Chinese
get upset when you meet – when the President meets with the Dalai Lama as well,
and you know, and you expect them to get angry about it and you’re willing to take
that hit. So my question is simply the same
as what I asked before, which is that what – were you
aware that this was going to cause consternation in Beijing? And if you could take the question or have someone
look into it --
MS HARF: Yeah, okay.
QUESTION: -- that would be great.
Thank you.
MS HARF: I’m not sure I’ll have
much more to say on that. I’m just going
to take a lot of questions today for Jeff on Monday.
這篇更好笑,我忽然想到一個有趣的邏輯。因為不承認台灣政府的官方地位,所以台灣的官方人士都屬於民間人士,因此與台灣官員的會面屬於非官方會面。這就像ROC護照一樣,因為不承認ROC是個國家,所以同時擁有ROC護照與美國護照在美國不屬於雙重國籍。
回覆刪除http://m.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/887212
jotto大,您已洩漏非國家ROC的最高機密,您最好學習電影全民公敵,拋棄所有電子裝置吧…
刪除