【Comment】
這篇是8月12日《自由時報》社論所指涉的「傳統基金會」文章 Market Solutions
Should Be Central to U.S.’s Taiwan Policy (PDF),文章發表於8月1日。
馬8月11日的演說則引用《華爾街日報》的 Taiwan
Leaves Itself Behind ,該文章發表於8月5日。
讀過華爾街文章的人告訴我,後半段與馬言論完全相同。當時就覺得怪。
從時間與嚴謹度看,《華爾街日報》的文章是針對「傳統基金會」文章而來,然後被馬操作。
這樣,也可以判斷是某種政治連線操作。此遠地呼應的戲碼似乎去年上演過,但一時無記憶。
Market Solutions Should Be Central to U.S.’s Taiwan Policy○William T. Wilson, Ph.D. (2014.08.01)
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/08/market-solutions-should-be-central-to-uss-taiwan-policy
Abstract
Taiwan has experienced a sharp deceleration in
economic growth since the late 1980s and early 1990s when it was averaging
lofty growth rates in the high single digits. Largely locked out of the free trade
agreements proliferating across Asia, Taiwan is quickly becoming ever more
economically dependent on China. Taiwan
has also grown dependent on China for its outward-bound foreign direct
investment (FDI). Accession to regional
economic agreements and economic liberalization would allow Taiwan to create a more diverse, flexible network of economic relationships
and fully operationalize its economy’s comparative advantages. Taiwan’s economic
status quo is not sustainable; it can be
changed with the right combination of policies. The United States should publicly encourage Taiwan’s bilateral and multilateral ambitions.
你好,我兩篇文章都看完了。
回覆刪除華爾街的立論跟馬先生說的是差不多。
我並不覺得華爾街那篇是針對 Market Solutions Should Be Central to U.S.’s Taiwan Policy 而來。
如果有相關其他證據能更明顯的指出,希望你可以找出來並公諸大眾。
不過就是金愛人的雕蟲小技,花點錢找個人在華爾街日報寫篇英文的文章並不困難啊!
回覆刪除外銷轉內銷,馬金長期以來不就是靠這樣耍弄台灣人嗎?
台灣駐外單位也是這樣玩的,找當地報紙寫一篇文章,再傳回台北說某國某報如何讚揚馬之政策⋯⋯
刪除台灣經濟的政治正確就是 地球村 + 賺盡全世界所有的錢。
回覆刪除可以想像南韓人應該也有相同的政治正確,為什麼大部分國家都不如此想?
這句話值得省思:「為什麼大部分國家都不如此想?」
刪除