網頁

2014-02-05

PACOM Chief: Uncontested US Control Of Pacific Is Ending○Defense News(2014.01.15)

PACOM Chief: Uncontested US Control Of Pacific Is EndingDefense News2014.01.15
The four-star commander of US Pacific Command says the era when the US military enjoys uncontested control over the Pacific’s blue water and its airspace is coming to an end.
Adm. Sam Locklear told a Navy conference in Virginia that the rise of China is a key factor that is putting at risk US Navy ships and service members in the Pacific.
Our historic dominance that most of us in this room have enjoyed is diminishing, no question,” Locklear said at the Surface Navy Association’s annual meeting near the Pentagon.
We need to think about all scenarios, not just the ones we’ve been dealing with over the last several years where we’ve enjoyed basic air superiority and basic sea superiority.  There are places in the world where in this century we won’t have them,” Locklear said.
Locklear rattled off a string of reasons for the military’s 2012 shift in strategy that calls for a “pivot to Asia.”
For one thing, the region “from Hollywood to Bollywood” is “the economic engine that drives the global economy,” he said.
The region also is becoming increasingly militarized and has no NATO-like security structure to prevent conflicts. And the rise of China’s military spending and capability is upending the status quo that took root after World War II.
Locklear said the focus on the Middle East over the past couple decades has drawn some attention from the military’s needs in the Pacific and its offensive capabilities at sea.
“To be honest with you, the lack of urgency on the development next-generation, surface-launch, over the horizon cruise missile is troubling,” Locklear said. “As the PACOM commander, I need you to be thinking in the offensive: How are you going to show up?  How are you going to be dominant?  How are you going to be lethal?”
It remains unclear what impact China ultimately will have on the U.S role in the Pacific.
“China is going to rise, we all know that.  [But] how are they behaving?  That is really the question,” Locklear said.  “The PACOM goal is for China to be a net provider of security, not a net user of security.”
Reminders of Chinese military growth are now routine in the Pacific.  The Navy recently acknowledged that a U.S. ship narrowly averted a collision with a Chinese ship that was conducting an exercise in international waters.
The Pentagon also acknowledged that the Chinese tested a hypersonic strike vehicle that could penetrate the current U.S. missile defense system.
“In the end, the bottom-line problem here is that ... we operate freely in international waters — period,” he said.
Locklear noted that the Chinese will for the first time this year join the annual naval exercise with the US and its Pacific allies, an important step in developing stronger ties with the Chinese navy.
Beyond China, Locklear said his most urgent concern is “an unpredictable North Korea,” its nuclear program and the missile development that is extending the reach of those nuclear weapons.
Today, North Korea has the capability to trigger a “catastrophic event” in the form of a nuclear assault on South Korea, which would severely impact the world economy and long-term security in Asia, Locklear said.
The ‘flash to bang’ of what can happen to Korea is very short,” Locklear said.

US Military Refocus on Pacific a Work in Progress

5 則留言:

  1. 這是典型的美式 threat inflation,

    完全冷戰餘韻。



    只要看幾個點:

    1)就整體綜合國力而言,中共與美國「根本不在一個檔次上」(套用匪語)。

    例:中國人對美國人,在「人」的素質上,根本「不具可比性」(套用匪語)。



    2)美軍在本區周邊廣泛的前進部署,

    可以全面打擊整個海、空範圍,

    以及中國本土全境目標。

    但中共對整個海、空範圍,

    以及美本土目標(甚至夏威夷)打擊能力有限。



    3)以主要的海、空、太空、資電戰力而言,

    中共軍對美軍整體戰力比,

    有超過冷戰期間蘇軍全盛時(1980年代中期)對美軍的整體戰力比嗎?

    例:就算東風-21D 真能干擾美航艦作戰,

    中共潛艦與反潛兵力能反制美軍水下兵力嗎?



    4)沒有俄羅斯支援,中共軍工產業有多少實力?

    例:共軍已表示對 J-20 不滿意。

    而「玉兔」遠低於宣稱設計目標的表現,更是一葉知秋。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 總體而言,北洋艦隊歷史重演,不是不可能。
      不過,似乎與蘇聯不同的是:東海與南海對全球海運線的重要性。
      「北洋艦隊」守得住就夠了。
      假使可以,中國的「區域霸權」也夠嗆了!
      假使不行,它也不怕誰敢佔領它。

      這種(流氓)國家不是天生可以天不怕、地不怕嗎?

      刪除
    2. 一眾「領導」的家人、髒錢 絕大部份都在美國或其勢力範圍內--

      習明澤目標大了一點兒,其他人更不會回國--

      到「時」抓人、扣錢,

      中華人民共和國「立馬」GAME OVER!



      試問在人類鬥爭的歷史上,何時有一方「領導」的相關 人、財,

      是如此虔敬地信仰、「趴」拜死敵?

      是如此大量地「壓寶/質押」在死敵手裡?

      還以此為榮?為尚?

      前蘇聯有這麼多 人、財 公然「壓寶/質押」在山姆手裡嗎?



      中共連紙老虎都算不上,屁都不是!

      拿啥打啊???!!!

      誰怕誰啊???!!!

      倒是真的怕跟這堆米田共比不要臉,

      還真的比不過!

      刪除
    3. 黑馬如此老神在在,

      或許是因為手裡捏著土龍的 LP,

      根本成竹在胸。

      刪除
    4. 王立軍一出事就往美領館跑,

      其實已經說明一切.................

      刪除

請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行