左膠——去脈絡化的平行正義 Useful idiot's discourse on Greenland: decontextualized justice

左膠——去脈絡化的平行正義　Naïve leftist discourse on Greenland: decontextualized justice

This image typically exemplifies the naïve leftist discourse — the vulnerable situation of indigenous peoples is indeed worthy of our care, and that point itself is not incorrect. However, concerning the recent events in Greenland, the overall situation carries a context of "strategic threat." This area is one of the frontlines for the United States in the Western Hemisphere, including the First Island Chain, Central and South America, and the Arctic Circle, while China has fully encroached upon this region. Discussions about the strategic importance of Greenland cannot be decontextualized.
Putting together the issues of "strategic threats in the Western Hemisphere" and "indigenous culture," there is a widespread call online urging major powers (the U.S. and Europe) to refrain from intervening and to allow indigenous peoples to decide for themselves, which seems reasonable at first glance. However, the problem is that China has extensively hunted land, emphasizing private land ownership while asserting the exclusion of government interference, followed by immigration. Consequently, China can continue to develop under a "civilian" guise and claim that its right to "develop China" should not be hindered — this is one of Beijing's national policy slogans.

這幅畫面典型地展現了左派的論述——原住民的弱勢處境是值得珍惜的，這一點本身並沒有錯。然而，針對近日格陵蘭事件而言，整體情勢有「戰略威脅」的「脈絡」。這裡是美國與西半球的前線之一，包括第一島鏈、中南美和北極圈等地，而當中國已經全面侵佔這個地區時，評論格陵蘭戰略重要性的議題不能「去脈絡化」。
將「西半球戰略威脅」與「原住民文化」問題並置在一起，在網路上流傳的大量呼籲，希望大國（美歐）不要插手，讓原住民自己決定，乍看之下看似是合理的。然而，問題在於，中國已經大量獵取土地，強調私有土地所有權，並主張排除政府干預，隨後進行移民。這樣一來，中國可以以「民間」的形式繼續發展，並且主張不應被阻止「中國發展」的權利——這是北京的國策口號之一。