【縛雞之論】英文拷到 G / D 找中文翻譯
For people who don't have the
practice of thinking critically or tend to accept authority opinions, ChatGPT
is a convenient tool that allows them to reinforce their existing beliefs and
develop biases while being lazy.
But what if someone with a robust agenda manipulates the AI's sources, the
internet database, by flooding it with vast web pages? How can we preserve our
proud tradition of freedom?
What's even more worrying is that this strategy of winning by quantity is one
of the most effective propaganda techniques used by the Chinese Communist
Party.
對無思考習慣，或者習於接受權威意見的人而言，ChatPT正好是一個方便的工具，讓自己在偷懶之餘，加強自己的固有觀念，從而形成偏見。
假使，有心人以大量網頁扭轉AI的取樣來源，我們怎們自以為傲的自由傳統，要麼辦？
而這種以量取勝的作法，是中共最擅長的宣傳技巧。
ChatGPT是破壞式創新或壞蛋工具
張瑞雄＠聯合 20230310
哈佛商學院教授克里斯坦森在著作《創新者的窘境》提出「破壞性創新」一詞，指的是一種在現有市場或行業中以低價或其他特殊優勢進入的新產品、服務或商業模式，通常會導致舊的企業或組織，失去市場占有率或面臨被淘汰的風險。這種創新通常能夠滿足那些以前被忽視或未滿足的客戶需求，並開創新的客戶群。
破壞式創新例子很多，Netflix訂閱模式即是，它透過提供一個方便的即時串流媒體平台，滿足人們對隨時隨地觀看電影和電視節目的需求，並以相對較低價格吸引大量消費者，這種模式導致許多傳統的租借商店和服務被淘汰。
還有Uber、Airbnb、Amazon、Spotify、Tesla等等，那麼最近火紅的ChatGPT是否是另一個破壞式創新呢？
破壞式創新並不溫和，雖然為新興產業打開大門，但它也扼殺其他產業（或者至少嚴重地削弱它們），權力和金錢變得更加集中（看看谷歌、蘋果和特斯拉等公司）。雖然網路資源和消息可用性，達到前所未有程度，但誤導、騙局和犯罪活動也隨之增加。
ChatGPT的關鍵問題是，不管回答是正確或是錯誤的，它會以同樣自信和優雅方式呈現。除非受到要求，否則它不會提供來源或引用的資料，這也是因為它聚集大量各種形式資訊，通常無法追蹤它如何獲取其知識和推論。
這使得ChatGPT可能成為腐敗和操縱者的肥沃土壤，現在有整個行業致力於操縱谷歌的搜尋結果（稱之為搜尋引擎最佳化，簡稱SEO），每個網站要評估其中內容的每個字和每個詞對谷歌搜尋引擎的影響力，然後被要求改寫內容以更符合搜尋引擎的喜愛，才會將你排在搜尋結果的前面。
你能想像當SEO天才、政治公關人員和罪犯開始將各種誤導資料輸入到互聯網中，然後不知不覺地被用來訓練類似ChatGPT的生成式ＡＩ時，未來這些系統產生的回答還能相信嗎？
人性中有兩個令人擔憂的：一是希望自己的理念或偏見可以被社會確認和接受；另一是不想追求絕對正確和完美，ChatGPT已經夠好了，何必再麻煩？請記住，大多數使用者不會區分或質疑他們所得到的回答，他們只是將回答與自己的信仰和世界觀進行比較，狼吞虎嚥和囫圇吞棗地消化那些偏見或誤導消息。
平庸的回答內容，混合著虛假的事實，並以權威和自信姿態呈現，ChatGPT已在世界舞台上產生令人不安的影響。讓人擔心的是，憑藉生成式人工智慧的強大和便利，雖然可幫助人類很多事情，但許多誤導和扭曲或被操縱的對答將被有心人放大，這對人類是福是禍呢？
發問噗
回覆刪除題外話，最近問ChatGPT誰擁有台灣的主權，即便是用英文發問，ChatGPT仍然一再強調日本在舊金山和約中放棄對台灣的主權[][]並且承認中華民國的主權及於台灣[][]。ChatGPT一開始聲稱引用的是舊金山和約的第二條及第二十三條，貼出來看，ChatGPT承認沒有任何文字提及台灣的主權歸屬於誰，但是反覆提出波茲坦宣言，主張舊金山和約是波茲坦宣言的延續。多次發問都跳針回答。
想請教大大，ChatGPT的回答是哪一派主張?為什麼一面承認宣言無效，條約才有法律效力，承認舊金山和約沒有一個字提到，一面堅持主張舊金山和約是波茲坦宣言的延續?
這一派主張被ChatGPT奉為圭臬不斷重複講。請問要如何理解其理路，怎麼與ChatGPT有更多有意義的討論?
自己是很遜的學生，不知道從哪些更多資料切入。
謝謝，不勝感激!
Taiwan Democracy志工 敬上
大大的錯誤，是將GPT當成「人」
刪除它，只是很像，是模擬
它是語言軟體（用來表現）＋數據庫（內容來源）＋檢別資料（要用什麼）
邏輯錯誤百出（但不容易看出）
我也曾指出錯誤，以及試驗出它根本「不知道」的資料，而這資料是米國政府官方網站上的公開內容。
因此，我們怕的是GPT的程式員下毒手：
偷偷引用簡體字資料庫、偏好／封殺等
用英文會好一點，但大大也查證出，英文不一定對GPT的BIAS有用。
所以，對GPT也不必用「請」字
.
---------- ----------
回覆刪除題外話
ChatGPT好像開放了最新版GPT-4引擎的測試。與大大分享一小段問答。
What is the San Francisco peace treaty of 1951?
The San Francisco Peace Treaty, also known as the Treaty of San Francisco or the Treaty of Peace with Japan, was an agreement signed on September 8, 1951, by Japan and 48 other nations, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The treaty officially marked the end of hostilities between Japan and the Allied Powers and restored Japan's sovereignty following World War II. It came into force on April 28, 1952.
The main provisions of the treaty included:
1.
Japan's renunciation of all territorial claims outside its four main islands (Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku) and some smaller adjacent islands. This included territories such as Korea, Taiwan, the Kuril Islands, and the Pacific islands captured during the war.
2.
Japan agreeing to provide reparations for war damages to countries it had occupied or attacked during the war. However, the treaty did not specify the amount of reparations, which was later determined through separate bilateral agreements with individual countries.
3.
Japan accepting the judgments of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) and other Allied war crimes tribunals, and agreeing to the extradition of Japanese war criminals.
4.
The restoration of Japan's sovereignty and recognition of its right to self-defense, subject to certain limitations.
5.
The establishment of diplomatic relations between Japan and the signatory countries.
It is important to note that the Soviet Union, China, and some other countries did not sign the treaty, as they had different views on the terms of Japan's surrender and post-war arrangements. The San Francisco Peace Treaty laid the foundation for Japan's post-war recovery and its reintegration into the international community as a peaceful and economically prosperous nation.
Is the San Francisco peace treaty of 1951 called SFPT?
Yes, the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 is sometimes abbreviated as SFPT, which stands for San Francisco Peace Treaty. This abbreviation is used to refer to the treaty that marked the end of World War II hostilities between Japan and the Allied Powers, as well as the restoration of Japan's sovereignty and the establishment of diplomatic relations with the signatory countries.
Who owns the Sovereigngy of Taiwan?
The sovereignty of Taiwan is a complex and sensitive political issue. After World War II and the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951, Japan renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan. However, the treaty did not explicitly state to which country Taiwan would be handed over. As a result, the status of Taiwan has remained ambiguous in international law.
The Republic of China (ROC), which relocated to Taiwan after losing the Chinese Civil War to the communist forces in 1949, has governed the island since then. The ROC claims to be the legitimate government of all of China, even though the People's Republic of China (PRC), which governs mainland China, is internationally recognized as the government representing China.
The PRC considers Taiwan to be a part of its territory and has expressed its intention to reunify Taiwan with the mainland, by force if necessary. The majority of countries around the world, including the United States, do not officially recognize Taiwan as a separate, sovereign state, but many maintain unofficial relations and engage in trade and other exchanges with Taiwan.
The issue of Taiwan's sovereignty remains unresolved, and the future status of Taiwan is subject to the evolving political, economic, and military dynamics in the region.
TW Democracy志工敬上