US President Joe Biden’s administration is considering ways to jointly manufacture arms with Taiwan either through US arms manufacturers providing Taiwan with the technology or Taiwan-made components being assembled in the US. Recent reports have said that arms deliveries from the US to Taiwan would be delayed. That could be a sign of a dramatic shift from “US-standard, US-made” to “US-standard, Taiwan-made” weapons.
US
support for Taiwan has been conditioned by its relations with China. When China
takes a peaceful attitude, the US pays less attention to Taiwan’s military
power. When China is aggressive, the US acts accordingly, contributing to
Taiwan’s defense capability based on existing acts.
In the
1979 Taiwan Relations Act, Section 2 specifies that “the US decision to
establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China rests upon
the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful
means.”
The
implication is clear: A Chinese invasion of Taiwan means a declaration of war
against the US, and an end to US-China relations.
Section 3
is the key to Taiwan’s arms industry: “The US will make available to Taiwan
such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary
to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”
The
Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology and Aerospace Industrial
Development Corp have developed F-16V and Indigenous Defense Fighter jets and
other weapons.
China has
focused on the 1982 Sino-US joint communique, particularly the following: Arms
sales to Taiwan from the US “will not exceed, either in qualitative or in
quantitative terms, the level of those supplied in recent years since the
establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the US,” and the US
would “reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a
final resolution.” However, it has conveniently forgotten then-National
People’s Congress chairman Ye Jianying’s (葉劍英) 1981 “nine
points,” with its promises of a peaceful China.
Furthermore,
then-US president Ronald Reagan said: “Any agreement we reach with Beijing will
be predicated on a continuation of Beijing’s peaceful intentions toward
Taiwan,” and “it is essential that the quantity and quality of the arms
provided [to] Taiwan be conditioned entirely on the threat posed” by China.
That is,
once Beijing resorts to the use of force, the US does not have to keep its
word.
In 2005,
China’s “Anti-Secession” Law was enacted. Article 8 states that China shall use
non-peaceful and other necessary means to defend its sovereignty and territory.
Furthermore, at the opening of the 20th National Congress, Chinese President Xi
Jinping (習近平) said: “We will never promise to give up the use of force, and reserve
the right to take all necessary measures.”
In
September 2017, the American Institute in Taiwan discussed with Taiwanese firms
ways to supply food, fresh water and household goods to US vessels, which was
sanctioned by the US National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.
Section 1259 of the report said that the US secretary of defense is to report
on “the feasibility and advisability of the US Navy making port calls to
Taiwan.” Since 2018, the successful bidder in Taiwan has started supplying US
vessels around Kaohsiung’s Second Port to Siaoliouciou Island (小琉球). Around the same time, a US Navy research vessel also berthed in
Kaohsiung Port’s Wharf No. 9.
The mode
of manufacturing arms should be changed to “US-standard, Taiwan-made,” and its
development deserves great attention.
HoonTing
is a political commentator.
Translated
by Liu Yi-hung
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行