【縛雞之見】英文請拷到 Google / DeepL 找中文翻譯
When Biden replied to the interview by ABC, he said that “Taiwan, South
Korea and NATO were fundamentally different situations to Afghanistan and
appeared to lump Taiwan together with countries to which Washington has
explicit defense commitments.”
Biden added: “We have made — kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article 5 that if in fact anyone were to invade or take action against our NATO allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with — Taiwan. It’s not even comparable to talk about that.”
So, why is NATO involved?
Does the fact that Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan attacked suggest the U.S. is attacked as well due to the alliance? If that is the case, then TRA, Taiwan Relations Act, the domestic law of the U.S. though, is a treaty of a coalition between the U.S. and Taiwan without the name.
U.S. and allies would 'take action'
if Taiwan attacked - Blinken Reuters 20211111
WASHINGTON,
Nov 10 (Reuters) - The United States and its allies would take unspecified "action" if China were
to use force to alter the status quo over Taiwan,
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Wednesday.
Blinken was
asked at a forum hosted by the New York Times
whether the United States would step in to defend Taiwan in the event of an attack
by China. He repeated regular U.S. statements that Washington's role is to make
sure the island has the means to defend itself, as is
required under U.S. law.
"At the
same time, I think it’s fair to say that we’re not alone in this determination to make sure
that we preserve peace and stability in that part of the world," Blinken added.
"There
are many countries, both in the region and beyond,
that would see any unilateral action to use force to disrupt the status quo as a significant threat to peace and security, and
they too would take action in the event that that happens."
Blinken did
not say what sort of action he was referring to.
U.S. President
Joe Biden caused a stir last month when he said the United States would come to
Taiwan's defense if China attacked. read
more
Those remarks
appeared to depart from a long held policy of "strategic ambiguity", not
making clear how the United States would respond. But the White House quickly said
Biden was not signaling a change in policy, and some analysts dismissed his comments
as a gaffe.
The Democratic
chairman of the influential House Intelligence Committee,
Adam Schiff, last week urged the Biden administration
to be less ambiguous about what he called a U.S.
obligation to defend Taiwan from attack by China. read
more
Blinken's
remarks came ahead of a planned virtual meeting between Biden and Chinese leader
Xi Jinping, which a source briefed on the matter told Reuters will be held as soon
as next week. read
more
Asked if the
meeting would happen next week, Blinken said it was "coming up soon" but
was not more specific.
Reporting
by David Brunnstrom Editing by Mark Heinrich
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行