The Chinese
Communist Party has no interest in becoming a
responsible global power. If that was not
clear from its flagrant industrial espionage or its imprisonment of a million Uyghur
Muslims, then the party’s blatant mishandling of the
Wuhan coronavirus should alleviate any doubt.
In December, the Community Chinese Party’s (CCP) propaganda machine reportedly
tried to tamp down initial concerns raised by
medical professionals in Wuhan. It accused
Li Wenliang, the doctor who initially tried to inform colleagues about the coronavirus
originating in Wuhan and its ability to spread from person to person, of “inciting
panic” and “spreading rumors” – until he himself tragically contracted the virus
and died.
The CCP also withheld live virus samples from the international
medical community for weeks, despite urgent pleas. Many suspect that the CCP continues to downplay
the spread of the coronavirus by underreporting infections
and deaths, especially given the shortages of
test kits and the communications blackout in central China.
It
gets worse.
Beijing pressured its fellow BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South
Africa) nations to issue supportive public statements, and it has bullied others not to take preventive measures. It even objected
to the World Health Organization sharing information with Taiwan, which
is home to one of the busiest airports in Asia – all this just to try to save face.
For two decades, we have
been told to wait for China to mature into a
responsible global power. Our political,
corporate, and cultural elites have proclaimed the wisdom and enrichment that were
supposed to come with accepting CCP’s spin on democracy, human rights, and economic
competition.
But it is clear that Beijing’s authoritarian tendencies are incompatible with responsible global leadership and the values
cherished by those who love freedom.
In the case of coronavirus, a democratic and open political system would not
just have identified the outbreak earlier; it would have also done its due diligence and shared accurate information to both its
own public and the global community in a timely manner.
Although Chinese citizens are severely repressed and intensely surveilled
by the Chinese government, there is an understanding that their government is failing them. Of course, if the CCP believes it is losing control,
the party will take further measures to close off civil
society.
America’s near-term challenge is facing down the extraordinary risk that the coronavirus poses internationally. Its high rate of
transmissibility is even more concerning because of the many unknown
factors about the disease’s origins and lethality. Beijing recently reported 15,000 new cases, bringing the total number of those
infected worldwide to more than 70,000.
In
the longer term, the United States must confront the threat posed by the Chinese
Communist Party. Amid this crisis, we
have seen the leverage the CCP is willing to exploit over other countries,
but many of our political, corporate, and cultural elites
are far too comfortable with the status quo despite its long-term threat to American
safety, security, and prosperity.
Because American companies have offshored so many of our medical supply chains
to an unreliable and opaque partner, America is vulnerable on multiple levels. For example, U.S. shoppers looking for medical
facemasks today will find themselves repeatedly thwarted by “sold out” and “out
of stock” signs because we rely on China, which is ground zero for the epidemic
and thus refuses to export any masks. Our
pharmaceutical industry is almost wholly dependent on foreign countries for active
pharmaceutical ingredients, with China being the primary supplier.
Beijing
understands the economic risk it faces – both because
of the Wuhan coronavirus itself but also international
backlash – and its foreign ministry is now demanding
that foreign countries re-normalize business with it. Ominously, the CCP
warns that by declining to restore trade ties, other nations risk damaging their
own economies because of the vast extent of economic integration.
For American businesses, it is a morbid reminder of why authoritarianism and market economics don’t mix in the long
run.
Mr. Rubio, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Florida.
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行