【Comment】
The point is new application with existing
technologies. That needs creativity.
Navy Quietly Fires 20 Hyper Velocity
Projectiles Through Destroyer’s Deckgun USNI News 20190108
Last summer USS Dewey (DDG-105) fired 20 hyper velocity projectiles (HVP) from a standard
Mk 45 5-inch deck gun in a quiet experiment that’s set to add new utility to
the weapon found on almost every U.S. warship, officials familiar with the test
have told USNI News.
The test,
conducted by the Navy and the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office as part of the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2018
international exercise, was part of a series of studies to prove the Navy could turn the more than 40-year-old deck gun
design into an effective and low-cost weapon against cruise missiles and
larger unmanned aerial vehicles.
While the HVP was originally designed to be the projectile for
the electromagnetic railgun, the Navy and the Pentagon see the potential
for a new missile defense weapon that can
launch a guided round at near-hypersonic speeds.
Currently, the
fleet uses a combination of missiles – like the Evolved Seasparrow Missile, the
Rolling Airframe Missile and the Standard Missile 2 – to ward off cruise
missile threats. The missiles are effective but also expensive,
Bryan Clark with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments told USNI
News on Monday.
In 2016,
guided-missile destroyer USS Mason (DDG-87) fired three missiles to ward off
two suspected Iranian cruise missiles fired from Houthi rebels in the Red Sea,
in what amounted to a multi-million dollar engagement.
“So if you think about the kinds of threats you might face in the
Middle East, the lower-end cruise missiles or a larger UAV, now you have a way
to shoot them down that doesn’t require you use a $2 million ESSM or $1 million
RAM because a hyper velocity projectile – even in the highest-end estimates
have it in the $75,000 to $100,000 range, and that’s for the fanciest version
of it with an onboard seeker,” he said.
An added
benefit of using HVP in powder guns is the
gun’s high rate of fire and a large magazine capacity.
“You can get 15 rounds a minute
for an air defense mission as well as a surface-to-surface mission,” Clark
said. “That adds significant missile defense
capacity when you think that each of those might be replacing a ESSM or a RAM
missile. They’re a lot less expensive.”
The HVP is also
being investigated to use with ground-based 155mm artillery pieces for the Army
and the Marines to provide limited air defense
options for forward-deployed troops in austere environments. HVPs could also find a home aboard the
Navy’s Zumwalt-class destroyers as a replacement round for the classes 155mm
Advanced Gun System.
While officials
confirmed to USNI News that the RIMPAC test was unclassified, both the Office
of the Secretary of Defense and the Office of Naval Research would not
acknowledge the test when asked by USNI News. A spokeswoman for OSD referred USNI News to
the Navy.
“I don’t have anything for you,” an ONR spokesman told USNI News on
Monday. HVP manufacturer BAE Systems referred USNI
News to the Navy when contacted.
In 2016,
William Roper, who then headed the SCO, said the promise of ONR’s HVP work had
been recognized by the Navy and the Army and changed the way the Pentagon
office thought about the evolution of the railgun.
“We now think that we can do pretty revolutionary things with
existing powder guns – think howitzers, Paladins, the Navy’s five-inch guns. We’ve shifted emphasis to that,” Roper said during a
2016 talk at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
“We have [more than] a 1,000 powder guns, we have very few railguns.”
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行