【修正版Remark】
這篇,基本由「葛特曼友人」翻譯。網友傳給我,Taimocracy做修正翻譯。
多謝「路過的路人A」的建設性建議。非常感謝。
我的英文雖然不佳,但我多半時候是將中英文都看過,才在標示出紅字後貼出。不是自己沒看過就胡亂貼出。
這篇證詞,或許因為時間急促,也許深受文化不同所致,所以中文翻譯上或許有些不準確之處。
為了避免翻譯「誤導」,請高手或熱心者,指出翻譯不當之處。讓我們改正,以便將正確原貌呈獻給讀者—這樣才不會成為「以一兩個不準確的翻譯」,而抹煞了「全篇證詞的貢獻」。
作為支持l'étranger
engage (Raymond Aron)的人,若只講原則論,那會誤導讀者—讓讀者以為「全部翻譯都沒有價值」,畢竟能完整讀完英文並正確理解的,是居於人口的少數。所以,Taimocracy著手校正。
敬請讀者幫忙。
***************************************************
Westminster
3rd Round Table Briefing on Organ Harvesting in China
Ethan Gutmann
16 October, 2018
英國西敏寺
中國強摘器官的第三次發佈會
伊森‧葛特曼
2018年10月16日
3rd Round Table Briefing on Organ Harvesting in China
Ethan Gutmann
16 October, 2018
英國西敏寺
中國強摘器官的第三次發佈會
伊森‧葛特曼
2018年10月16日
Thank you.
I’ll be speaking about Taiwan today, but I want to begin with four stubborn facts.
謝謝,我今天會講到台灣,但我想先提到四點不可否認的事實
1) Our report, Bloody Harvest/The Slaughter: an
Update, released in 2016, showed that China is not performing 10,000 or 15,000
transplants per year as Beijing claims, but 60,000 to 100,000
transplants a year. Huang Jiefu, China’s
spokesman on the organ harvesting issue recently embraced that volume. He says that China will be doing 50,000
transplants in a few years. Where will
the organs come from?
我們在2016年發布的報告《血腥的器官摘取/大屠殺:更新版》顯示,中國絕不只像北京宣稱的每年進行10,000至15,000次的器官移植,而是60,000到100,000件。中國政府在器官移植議題上的發言人黃潔夫最近也基本接受了這個數量。他說中國在幾年內就會達到每年50,000件器官移植的數量,這些器官都哪裡來的?
2) Over the last year, Beijing has blood-tested
approximately 15 million Uyghurs – every man, woman and child in Xinjiang.
在過去一年中,北京政府從超過1,500萬維吾爾族人身上抽取了血液樣本,包含新疆的每個男人、女人、小孩
3) As I speak, over one million Uyghurs are in “Re-education Camps.”
在我講話的當下,超過一百萬維吾爾族人被關在所謂「再教育營」中
4) And the CCP are building 9 crematoriums in
Xinjiang. The first one in Urumqi has
just opened. It has 50 security guards.
中共還在新疆建立9個火葬場。第一個剛剛在烏魯木齊開始運作。光是那一個就駐紮了50名保安人員
We cannot - I cannot - stop Beijing, any more than
a monk on the West coast of Ireland could stop the Vikings from pillaging
European civilization. My job is to
compile an accurate history. So, I am
going to examine one factor - one among many - that I believe contributed to
the current situation.
我無法阻止中共,就像當年在愛爾蘭西岸旁觀的僧侶無法阻止維京人橫掃歐洲文明一樣。但我的工作是要把歷史準確的陳述出來。今天我要講一個重點(還有其他因素),這是我覺得促成了今天器官活摘現狀的重要因素。
It’s a medical technology known as ECMO. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. And a man named Dr. Wen-je, third from the right in
this photograph of an ECMO conference at Wuxi Hospital in 2008. Dr. Ko is currently mayor of Taipei. Dr. Ko’s involvement in ECMO goes back to at
least 2000.
那就是叫做葉克膜(ECMO)的醫學技術。體外循環技術。還有一位叫做柯文哲的人,就是這張照片右邊數來第三人,這是在2008年無錫市醫院舉辦的葉克膜研討會上拍攝的照片。柯醫師為現任台北市市長,柯醫師至少早自2000年就涉及葉克膜。
In 2008, Dr. Ko told me in an interview that he knew first-hand
about Falun Gong organ harvesting in at least one hospital in China back in
2005 – and that account of the
interview, which was agreed on by
both parties in writing, is now in my
book, The Slaughter.
柯醫師在2008年的一次訪談中告訴我,他最早在2005年就親身經歷知道,中國至少有一間醫院在活摘法輪功學員的器官。這場訪談現在被記錄在我的書《屠殺》裡,而且我們雙方當年都同意了我出版的書《屠殺》的內容。
That account will never change. But my view of Dr. Ko? That has changed.
書裡的內容永遠不會改變,但我對柯醫師的觀感呢?已經改變。
As I discovered shortly before I went to Taiwan to
promote the Mandarin publication of my book, Dr. Ko was at this conference only three months before our interview in 2008. I
cannot un-see the picture. And I cannot
un-see the schedule for the conference that Ko participated in.
在我最近出發到台灣推廣我的書中譯本之前,我發現柯醫師在我們2008年訪談進行前三個月,曾經參與了這場葉克膜研討會。我無法否認這張照片。我也不會忘記柯參與研討會的會議行程表。
Many Taiwanese researchers are far more equipped
to investigate this conference than I am.
And in fact, my own findings on this conference has already been
surpassed by Falun Gong researchers. But
if I use sources I trust - the 2016 Update with Kilgour and Matas, which I
co-wrote, and documents from the World Organization to Investigate the
Persecution of Falun Gong, which I co-edited - I can say a few words about the
hospitals and individuals on this schedule.
許多在台灣研究這個議題的人,都比我更有能力進一步調查這場葉克膜研討會。事實上,法輪功的研究者已經超越了我自己收集到這個研討會的資料。但光就我在2016年與大衛·麥塔斯和大衛·喬高共同撰寫的報告,我可以對這場研討會上出現的醫院和醫生稍加說明。
Every individual and hospital that is suspected to
have been involved in the organ harvesting of political and religious prisoners
is highlighted in red. Although there are
ambiguities about Dr. Ko’s activities in China, for simplicity,
I have also highlighted Ko Wen-je’s name in red. Ko was the only non-mainlander to give a
presentation. He presents at the 12:00 session.
我們在這裡把每個懷疑曾涉嫌對政治和宗教良心犯進行器官活摘的個人和醫院都用紅體字標註起來,儘管我們對於柯醫師在中國究竟做了什麼共謀還有疑慮,我們也先把他的名字改成紅色。柯是唯一一位非大陸人發表者。他在當天中午12點進行了講座
This schedule is a sea of red. I’ll just go down the list in order, starting
with the conference venue:
本議程一片紅色標記。我將順次序說明。先由會議地點開始。
• Wuxi People’s Hospital was closely examined in
our 2016 update because it is exclusively approved for lung transplants - and yet we know
it also carries out eight other types - kidney, liver, heart, pancreas, cornea,
stem cell, bone marrow, and vascular grafts.
Because Wuxi claims to have completed more than half of all lung transplant surgeries in China, we suspect that some of those lungs are
from Falun Gong.
• 我們在2016年的更新報告中,特別檢視了無錫市人民醫院,因為該院不只獲得獨特的肺移植許可,還進行其他八種移植手術,腎臟、肝臟、心臟、胰臟、角膜、幹細胞、骨髓、和人工血管。因為無錫市人民醫院宣稱他們進行超過全中國一半數量的肺移植手術,我們懷疑一些肺臟來自法輪功學員。
• 我們在2016年的更新報告中,特別檢視了無錫市人民醫院,因為該院不只獲得獨特的肺移植許可,還進行其他八種移植手術,腎臟、肝臟、心臟、胰臟、角膜、幹細胞、骨髓、和人工血管。因為無錫市人民醫院宣稱他們進行超過全中國一半數量的肺移植手術,我們懷疑一些肺臟來自法輪功學員。
• Chen Zhonghua participated in multi-organ extractions from 65 “donors” from January 2000 to August 2006. When Chen ran the Wuhan Tongji hospital
institute of organ transplantation in 2006, the hospital was asked if it could
perform live organ transplantation from
Falun Gong prisoners. The Kidney Transplant department replied:
“Sure, it’s no problem…When you are ready, you can come over directly and we
will discuss it in detail.”
• 陳忠華從2000年1月到2006年8月對65個「器官捐贈者」進行了多器官同時移除手術。在2006年,陳忠華還是武漢同濟醫院器官移植研究所的所長的時候,海外的調查人員打電話向醫院詢問他們,是否可以進行法輪功囚犯器官的移植時,該醫院的腎臟移植部門回覆「沒問題啊,當你準備好時,直接到我們醫院來,跟我們討論細節。」
• Liu Deruo: Department of Surgery in the
China-Japan Friendship Hospital. 7 cases
of single lung transplantation from brain-dead "donors” – a euphemism for
live organ harvesting - before 2008. The
hospital is a common destination for wealthy Japanese “organ tourists.”
• 這是劉德若,中日友好醫院的外科醫師,在2008年前進行過7次的肺移植手術,都是從腦死的所謂「器官捐贈者」(被活摘器官受害者的委婉說法)身上取得。中日友好醫院是富有的日本「器官旅客」常來的熱門醫院。
• Chen Jingyu, the “No.1 Lung Transplant Surgeon
in China.” Extracted lungs from 129
"donors" from 2002 to 2011. By
2014, Chen was doing up to five lung transplants per day. Taught perfusion preservation to 30 hospitals
in 10 cities and provinces. If I am not
mistaken, that’s Dr. Ko on the left, and Dr. Chen on the right.
• 接下來是陳靜瑜,號稱「中國肺移植手術第一人」,2002年到2011年間從「捐贈者」身上取出了129個肺臟。到2014年為止,陳靜瑜每天平均做五個肺移植手術,他向10個城市和省分的30間醫院教導灌注保存器官技術。假使我沒記錯,柯醫師就在左邊,而陳醫師在右邊。
• Fuwai Hospital, number 1 in heart transplants. Song Yunhu is the chief surgeon.
• 北京阜外醫院,這個醫院進行中國最多的心臟移植,宋雲虎是主任醫師
• Shanghai Chest Hospital, Gao Chengxin. The most bilateral lung transplants in China to date. Dr. Han
Baohui, director of pulmonary medicine at Shanghai Chest Hospital, reported
classmate Zhao Bin to the police for practicing Falun Gong. Mr. Zhao was arrested in April 2012 and was
tortured to death at a Shanghai facility on October 19, 2013.
• 接下來是上海市胸科醫院的高成新,進行了中國最多的雙肺移植手術。該院的肺內科主任韓寶惠,曾向警察當局告密自己的同學趙斌修煉法輪功。趙斌在2012年4月被捕,2013年10月19日在上海的監獄被凌虐致死。
• Chen Liangwen, VP of Fujian Medical University
Union Hospital, extracted hearts from 111 brain-dead "donors” - average
age about 25 years, no cardiovascular diseases.
Warm ischemia time of 0-15 minutes, suggesting pre-scheduled live organ harvesting.
• 福建醫科大學附屬協和醫院副院長陳良萬,他從111個腦死的「捐贈者」取出心臟,平均壽命25歲,都沒有心臟疾病,熱缺血時間為0-15分鐘,這又是另一項紀錄,指出了是事先計畫好了的器官活摘
• Wang Chunsheng.
Director of Cardiac Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital in Shanghai, Shanghai’s
premier organ transplant center. From
2000 to 2011, Wang extracted hearts from 298 "donors”: average age 27
years; no cardiovascular problems. Since
2007, 238 live hearts have been extracted at Zhongshan.
• 王春生,上海中山醫院的心臟外科主任。從2000到2011年,王從298名「捐贈者」身上取出心臟,平均壽命27歲,沒有心臟疾病歷史。2007年以來,他取出了238個活的心臟。
• Here is a recorded phone call to Zhongshan from
2006:
Investigator: … So how long do I have to wait [for
organ transplant surgery]?
Doctor: About a week after you come…
Investigator: Is there the kind of organs that come from Falun Gong? I heard that they are very good.
Doctor: All of ours are those types.
Here’s a quote from Tan Yunshan, director of Zhongshan Hospital’s liver disease department in 2015.
“All the donor livers are directly extracted at the source. Because we do the extraction ourselves and have access to the original information of the donor organ, we would know for sure whether a donor liver can be used or not…We don’t care whether it’s from a Falun Gong practitioner or not. We don’t get involved in politics. As doctors, we only care about the donor liver, about whether it meets the requirements of transplantation. If it meets the requirements, we don’t care who it’s from.”
Doctor: About a week after you come…
Investigator: Is there the kind of organs that come from Falun Gong? I heard that they are very good.
Doctor: All of ours are those types.
Here’s a quote from Tan Yunshan, director of Zhongshan Hospital’s liver disease department in 2015.
“All the donor livers are directly extracted at the source. Because we do the extraction ourselves and have access to the original information of the donor organ, we would know for sure whether a donor liver can be used or not…We don’t care whether it’s from a Falun Gong practitioner or not. We don’t get involved in politics. As doctors, we only care about the donor liver, about whether it meets the requirements of transplantation. If it meets the requirements, we don’t care who it’s from.”
• 下面是對中山醫院肝調查的電話錄音:
調查員:要等多久呀?
醫生:來了一個禮拜左右就可以做了。
調查員:有沒有這種煉法輪功的這種提供的,這種提供的說是很好……
醫生:我們這兒的都是這種
醫生:來了一個禮拜左右就可以做了。
調查員:有沒有這種煉法輪功的這種提供的,這種提供的說是很好……
醫生:我們這兒的都是這種
「所有捐獻肝都是直接從源頭獲取的。因為我們自己進行提取,並且能夠獲得捐贈器官的原始信息,我們就能確定捐獻者的肝臟是否可以使用… 我們不關心它是否來自法輪功學員。我們不參與政治。作為醫生,我們只關心捐贈的肝臟,關心它是否符合移植的要求。如果它符合要求,我們不關心它來自誰。」
• Meng Xu, founder of the Beijing Heart Transplant
Centre. From 1992 to 2006, Meng
participated in the extraction of hearts from 51 “donors”: males; age range
21-43 years. No cardiovascular diseases. Warm
ischemia time, 3-8 minutes. Meng has independently completed nearly
10,000 surgeries, with over 800 operations every year.
• 孟旭,北京心臟移植中心的創始人,從1992年到2006年他參與了摘除51個「器官捐贈者」的心臟,都是男性,年齡21-43歲,沒有心臟疾病歷史。熱缺血時間為3-8分鐘。孟旭獨自完成了將近10,000次手術,每年都有超過800次。
• 孟旭,北京心臟移植中心的創始人,從1992年到2006年他參與了摘除51個「器官捐贈者」的心臟,都是男性,年齡21-43歲,沒有心臟疾病歷史。熱缺血時間為3-8分鐘。孟旭獨自完成了將近10,000次手術,每年都有超過800次。
I am going to skip ahead because we are short on
time.
因為時間不夠,我在這裡要跳過一些內容。
• Last entry; Tianjin Central Hospital. Estimated to do 5,000 transplants annually,
essentially half of the entire transplant volume of China, according to Chinese
official numbers, for over a decade. Over
half of its patients are said to be foreign organ tourists.
• 最後一個是天津市第一中心醫院。估計每年有5,000件器官移植,十幾年來幾乎占據官方統計全國移植數量的一半。過半數在這裡接受器官移植的是外國人。
• 最後一個是天津市第一中心醫院。估計每年有5,000件器官移植,十幾年來幾乎占據官方統計全國移植數量的一半。過半數在這裡接受器官移植的是外國人。
So what was this conference about? Well, as the conference subtitle suggests: Medtronic ECMO. Medtronic is an
American company based in Minnesota. And,
Dr. Ko sells Medtronic ECMO machines and
expertise on the Mainland.
這個研討會討論什麼?會議的副標題指出:美敦力葉克膜。美敦力是位於明尼蘇達州的美國公司。柯醫師銷售給中國大陸美敦力葉克膜機器與專業技術。
ECMO can be used during harvesting, but the bottom
line is that it prolongs the opportunity to use a lung or a heart up to eight
hours. As Dr. Ko has pointed out, ECMO
saves lives.
葉克膜可以用於活摘器官,它的底線是可以將肺臟或心臟的壽命延長最長達8小時,柯醫師指出葉克膜可以拯救生命
Indeed, it does.
In Taiwan, in America, in Great Britain, in Japan, Australia. But in China, with a nearly inexhaustible
supply of religious and political prisoners, do you think the majority of
people at this.
的確。(葉克膜)在台灣、美國、英國、日本、澳洲(都拯救生命)。但在中國,因為有著幾乎無限量供應的宗教和政治良心犯,(你認為大多數人都在這嗎???)
ECMO conference were interested in saving lives? I think they were interested in making money. From the perspective of that conference, Dr. Ko
was valuable – until 2008 at least - to the Mainland organ transplant industry
in three ways:
葉克膜研討會對拯救人命有興趣嗎?我想他們有興趣的是賺錢。從研討會的角度來看,柯醫師很有價值的,至少到2008年為止,柯醫師對於中國大陸器官移植產業有三方面:
1) As a conduit to “organ tourists” from Taiwan
為台灣「器官旅客」扮演管道的角色
2) As a salesman of Medtronic ECMO equipment to the Mainland
為推銷美敦力葉克膜設備到中國大陸,扮演一個推銷員的角色
3) As a teacher of ECMO techniques.
為葉克膜技術,扮演一個教師的角色
ECMO means that if you are harvesting a Falun
Gong, or a Uyghur, or a Tibetan, you can make a lot more money from harvesting
a single person. Here are the prices. And here is a picture
of five Falun Gong refugees.
葉克膜意味著:如果你對法輪功學員、維吾爾人、或西藏人進行器官活摘,你可以從一個人身上賺取更多錢。這張就是器官的價格表。而這張照片就是五名法輪功的難民。
All of the women in this picture were in labor
camp. All were tortured. One was sexually abused. And the woman on the left, Jing Tian, was
examined for her organs. Before ECMO, if
she was harvested while still alive, and tissue matched to foreign organ
tourists who were present at the same hospital, she was worth $200,000 USD, maybe
$250,000 USD, if we throw in the corneas.
Let’s split the difference and call it $225,000 USD.
所有這張照片裡的女子都被關進勞改營。她們全都被刑求過。在勞改營中她們其中一人遭受了性侵害。而最左邊這名女士金田(音譯)還被檢驗過器官。若無葉克膜,如果她活生生的被摘取器官,而組織與來到該醫院的外國器官移植者配對成功,她的器官總價值會是大約$200,000美元,如果加上眼角膜或許$250,000美元。姑且估算為$225,000美元。
After ECMO? Jing Tian was worth $680,000 USD. And I think everyone at that ECMO conference
in 2008 understood this calculation.
如果有了葉克膜呢?金田身上的器官價值會增加到$680,000美元。我認為參加那個2008年葉克膜研討會的所有人,都非常清楚這個數字計算。
In short, no matter what the original intentions
were, bringing ECMO to China created a perverse incentive to kill Falun Gong, Uyghurs, House Christians and
Tibetans. We don’t know how many. We
don’t know exactly how much Dr. Ko contributed to ECMO in China. Yet I have
no doubt that ECMO accelerated
the killing of innocent people. And I have no doubt that ECMO is a
contributing factor to the spectacular growth of the transplant industry in
China - and the spectacular human
rights crisis that we see in Xinjiang
today.
簡單說,無論最初把葉克膜引進中國的用意為何,它所帶來的結果就是讓中國有更多殺害法輪功學員、維吾爾人、西藏人的不正當動機。我們不知道柯醫師對於中國的葉克膜技術到底幫助了多少。但我對葉克膜加速了無辜的人被殺害,毋庸置疑。我對葉克膜導致中國器官移植產業的急速發展也毋庸置疑,還有我們所見在新疆發生巨大的人權危機。
But is all this fair to Taiwan? Dr. Ko is the respected mayor of Taipei. He’s running for reelection. So, does Taiwan really have to deal with questions about what Dr. Ko was doing at the conference-from-hell a decade ago? In
conclusion then, I want to explain why I think it is my responsibility as a
writer, and as a co-founder of the International Coalition to End Transplant
Abuse in China - or ETAC for short - to ask these questions.
但講這些對台灣公平嗎?柯醫師現在是受人歡迎的台北市市長。他還在競選連任。台灣應該處理有關柯醫師十年前在這個「地獄研討會」嗎?我想說結論我想說明,我作為一個作者,還有做為「全球制止中國器官強摘聯盟」(ETAC)的共同發起人,我必須問一些問題。
One of the clearest voices in ETAC
- a voice of constant wisdom, calm, and clarity - is that of David Matas. So, when some transplant patients warned us
that our work was being used by anti-vax conspiracy theorists, I
proposed that ETAC begin promoting voluntary organ donation. Matas stopped me short with a single phrase:
“avoid mission creep.” And he was right; groups dilute their strength
by adopting other agendas. And ETAC’s
primary mission is to save lives in China.
「全球制止中國器官強摘聯盟」裡面,一向最有遠見、最冷靜、而又最清楚的專家是大衛·麥塔斯。當一些器官移植的病患開始提醒我們,說我們的成果被一些「反疫苗接種的陰謀論者」使用時,我提議聯盟可以開始鼓勵自願的器官捐贈註冊。大衛·麥塔斯則馬上制止我,他說「不要失焦」。他是對的,我們的聯盟若是涉及其他議題便會分散力量,而我們最主要的任務還是要拯救中國的生命。
And yet: David Matas recently compared organ
harvesting of political and religious prisoners in China to a virus, a virus which does not end
at China’s borders, but has begun to infect pockets of the global medical community.
大衛·麥塔斯近來將活摘中國政治犯和宗教良心犯器官比喻為一種「病毒」—這種「病毒」並不會止於中國境內,而是已經感染到全球各地醫學社團的口袋。
Think of the Vatican conferences on human
trafficking, where China’s organ transplant apparatus was presented as an example
for the world to follow.
想想看梵諦岡舉辦的有關非法人口走私的論壇,中國的器官移植團體不但前往與會,還被論壇當作全世界未來的範例。
Think of The Transplantation Society’s
high-profile visits to China, where members of their entourage referred to
Falun Gong as an “evil cult” - to the delight of the Mainland Chinese Press.
可以想想看國際器官移植協會如何的高調造訪中國,其成員還將法輪功描述為「邪教」,這說法讓中共官方媒體大為吹捧
Think of Huang Jiefu’s promise to bring Chinese
transplant methods, including the transport of human organs, as a sort of perk to participants in China’s Belt and Road initiative.
可以想想看黃潔夫如何誇耀中國的器官移植系統,將它當成是獎勵支持中國一帶一路國家的禮物
So, if ETAC has another mission – a mission which
clearly separates us from the sort of activism that can be reduced to a T-shirt
slogan such as “Save the whales” or “Free Tibet”- it is this: history matters.
所以如果「全球制止中國器官強摘聯盟」有另一個任務,而不會淪於膚淺的像是常看到在T-shirt上「拯救鯨魚」或「拯救西藏」的口號,那就是「歷史很重要」。
Mass murder - or “Cold Genocide” if you prefer -
permanently alters the DNA of a society, not only in the victim populations, where the trauma ripples
through generation after generation, but in the perpetrator class as well,
where mass murder becomes an accepted method, an option, a tactic, to solve a
problem or cover up an inconvenient crime.
And I submit that describes Chinese organ harvesting accurately over the
last two decades. And that history must
be exposed. And we have no choice but to
call out anyone who actively seeks to suppress that history.
集體屠殺、或「冷血種族屠殺」會永久性的改變一個社會的DNA,不只對受害者而已—創傷在一代又一代間漣漪;也在犯罪者團體中—集體屠殺成為為了解決問題或掩蓋不願意面對的犯罪時,一種可接受的方法、方案、戰術。我這裡敘述的是過去二十年中國器官活摘的真相。而這歷史真相必須被揭發出來。我們別無選擇,只能呼籲任何積極尋求壓制那歷史的人。
Just two weeks ago, I watched as Taiwan’s Ministry
of Health showed a surprising new
transparency regarding the number of
Taiwanese organ tourists who went to the Mainland - and resolved to enforce
penalties on those who continue to flaunt Taiwan’s regulations. And I sat down in Taipei with some of the
most impressive research professionals in the world.
兩周前,我很看到台灣的衛生部長對前往中國大陸接受器官移植的台灣人數量,提供更為令人驚訝地透明化措施,並且決心導入嚴厲的懲罰來約束那些繼續違反台灣法規的人。我在台北也與許多這方面議題世界級的專家促膝長談。
And what is the focus of their investigations? It can be summarized in a single world: Complicity. It may be
a minority at present, but many in Taiwan want to end medical complicity with the Mainland and they have opened multiple investigative lines. ECMO is only one piece of the puzzle. Several
individuals – I won’t name them here - from several Taiwanese medical entities,
possibly with different political affiliations - will likely be exposed.
他們調查的重點是什麼?我們可以用一個字來總結,那就是「共犯結構」。現在關心這個議題的人可能只是少數,但台灣的確有許多人會希望終止台灣與中國醫界掛鉤的共犯結構,而他們開始了多方調查陣線。葉克膜只是這個共犯結構謎團的一部分。台灣有幾個人,我不想說出他們的名字,從許多台灣醫療機構、跨黨派政客,他們都可能被揭發。
This is the darkness that lies ahead. This is the unspoken fear that haunts
Taiwanese society.
這是我們要面對的黑暗。這也是台灣社會在揭露黑暗前的深層恐懼。
Now, it is much easier to attack me - or my 15-year-old
son’s Instagram page for that matter - than to face that fear. Or to threaten Falun Gong practitioners. Or my publisher. Or to dismiss the whole thing as a political
stunt. Or to simply say that there is
“no evidence.”
你們為了逃避這種揭露黑暗的恐懼,當然可以很容易地針對我、攻擊我,甚至跑去騷擾我15歲兒子的Instagram帳號。或是去威脅台灣的法輪功學員。或攻擊幫我出書的出版者。你們甚至把整個事件形容是「政治打手」。或說什麼「沒有證據」。
Human Rights Organizations around the world
quietly said just that for many years, until there was a tipping point. Our reports were, to paraphrase the US Congress,
simply too “persistent and credible” to be ignored. Hearings were held. The press reported. And professionals from around the world laid
their reputations on the line by joining Doctors Against Forced Organ
Harvesting and ETAC. It became simply
too embarrassing for Human Rights NGOs to deny the harvesting issue. Yet they did not shout “bloody murder” from
the rooftops. Neither did any
China-based reporter who treasures their Beijing access. Because their own actions during the years of
denial was a form of “soft complicity.”
多年來,全世界的人權組織一直抱持那樣的態度,直到越過臨界點。美國國會都說我們的報告「太有一貫性和說服力」無法忽略。舉行聽證會。媒體有報導。全球各地的專家也都以他們的名聲替我們背書,支持「反強摘器官醫生組織」和「全球制止中國器官強摘聯盟」。人權組織發現他們若要繼續否認器官活摘,會太丟臉。但他們仍然沒有大聲的承認整件事是「血腥屠殺」。那些希望留在中國並與北京接觸的國際記者,也沒報導。因為他們那麼多年來不承認此事,正是「準共犯」的一種型態。
So yes, Taiwan
is hardly alone in complicity. And that
complicity is why Beijing has been able to carry out a vast crime against
humanity in plain sight of the world, with relatively little consequence. And the
lethargic Western response has terrible implications for our collective future.
是的,台灣只是共犯之一。而這種共犯結構正是為什麼北京可以在世人關注下持續犯下「反人類罪」而幾乎無須承擔後果。西方世界對於中共暴行的軟弱反應對於我們的未來都會有可怕的影響。
And that is why the eyes of the world are
on Taiwan today. Because Western, Japanese and South Korean
medical entities - whether they have hard
or soft complicity in Chinese organ
harvesting - are watching. Medtronic,
The Transplantation Society, and the Vatican are watching. The US Congress and Westminster are watching. How strange for such a small country to
have such influence, such power. But, just this once, Taiwan has the whip hand.
這就是為什麼全世界現在都把焦點放在台灣。因為西方、日本、南韓的醫界,無論他們是否已是共犯或準共犯結構的一環,都在觀望台灣。美敦力、國際器官移植協會、梵諦岡在密切觀望。美國國會、英國國會也在密切觀望。台灣這麼小一個國家竟然有這麼大的影響力和權力。就這次,台灣真的變成了決定未來的關鍵。
As someone who has taken a few punches - and as
someone who has pushed back a little too - I respect Taiwan’s free press and
democracy. Politics may be a contact
sport, and the news cycle may come down to 6 hours rather than 24, but the
energy? It is irresistible. I suspect that Taiwan will find the truth of
these matters – and I will advocate for Taiwan as the forward base of ETAC
investigative activities going forward.
我本人因為此事受到許多攻擊,我也毫無懼怕地回擊一點,但我尊重台灣的自由媒體環境和民主。政治就像是肢體競技一樣,而媒體的新聞熱度可能只是以6小時為單位,而不是24小時,但事件的力道呢?是無法抵擋的。我推測台灣會繼續在這件事情上挖掘出真相,我也支持台灣成為全球制止中國器官強摘聯盟未來進行器官活摘調查的重要根據地。
While I was in Taiwan, the news came that Beijing,
finally feeling the global heat for incarcerating a million Uyghurs in camps,
has moved 300,000 Uyghurs to undisclosed locations. Those locations may – or may not – be near
organ harvesting facilities and hospitals.
That’s speculation. It’s too
early to say. But we are through the
looking glass here - and it is theoretically possible that how Taiwan reacts
might even influence how many Uyghur men, women, and even children will live or
die.
我在台灣時看到來自北京的新聞報導,中共因世界關注其把一百萬維吾爾族人關在集中營裡,而開始將300,000維吾爾族人強行移到別的地方。我們不知道他們被移到新的地方,是否有可能就是器官活摘的設施和醫院。這目前還是臆測。但我們可以看出,台灣對此事的反應,有可能會影響眾多維吾爾族男人、女人、小孩的未來,甚至他們的生死。
So if Taiwan is listening? Show us the way, Taipei. This is your time to stand up for China’s victims, to speak up for those who have no voice. Show
us that Taiwan will follow the truth, wherever it may lead.
【網友小虎提供翻譯】因此若台灣正在聽(我的證詞). 台北!請向我們(全世界)展現(你們追求真相的)勇氣。這是你們替在中國無法發聲的受害者挺身而出的機會。請向我們(全世界)展現台灣追求真相的決心,就算(台灣)也許是首先發難(也應該在所不惜)。
Thank you.
謝謝
-葛特曼友人翻譯
"那裡"已經被人扭曲原意了
回覆刪除尤其看到"共犯"兩字。
刪除以下是個人意見:
通常西方文字的重點都是放在後面,並且講要如何解決這個重點,
而中文則是將重點放前,有種貼人標籤的意思在。
或許是文字的陳述脈絡方式不同,進而造成人的思考方式不同,
就算經過了翻譯也一樣。
翻譯過的文字還是得回到原文的陳述脈絡去思考原意,而不是用翻譯過的那個文字陳述脈絡去思考
我想這是個很大的盲點跟漏洞所在
我的英文雖然不佳,但我多半時候是將中英文都看過,才標示出紅字貼出。
回覆刪除不是胡亂貼出。
這篇證詞,或許因為時間急促,也許深受文化不同所致,所以中文翻譯上也些不準確之處。
為了避免翻譯「誤導」,請高手或熱心者,指出翻譯不當之處。
讓我們改正,以便將正確原貌呈獻給讀者。
如果只講原則論,那也是再誤導讀者—讓讀者以為全部翻譯都沒有價值。
敬請讀者幫忙。
已經早有人把這篇的翻譯(非您所翻譯的)放到"那裡"去了,"那裡"已經被人扭曲原意。
回覆刪除所以我才會這麼講
的確有速度或情緒上的錯誤。
刪除已經校正好了,請網友努力,再使它完美。
翻譯使它-------一氣呵成,展現含意
回覆刪除最後一句:
因此若台灣正在聽(我的證詞). 台北!請向我們(全世界)展現(你們追求真相的)勇氣。這是你們替在中國無法發聲的受害者挺身而出的機會。請向我們(全世界)展現台灣追求真相的決心,就算(台灣)也許是首先發難(也應該在所不惜)。