Next clash between US and China HoonTing@Taipei Times 20180718 Translated by
Julian Clegg
By HoonTing 雲程 /
Wed, Jul 18, 2018 -
Page 8
On July 7, the USS
Benfold and the USS Mustin — two US Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile
destroyers equipped with the Aegis Combat System — passed northward through the
Taiwan Strait on their way to their home base of US Fleet Activities Yokosuka in
Japan.
Why did the US Navy
ships choose to sail through the Strait? Was it to avoid the approaching
Typhoon Maria? At the time, the typhoon was still more than 1,000km away from
Taiwan, not far from Guam and too far away from the destroyers to have any effect
on them.
Furthermore, the
Strait is relatively shallow, with a narrow airspace above it, which makes it
unsuitable for engaging in combat under modern technological conditions.
Much more suitable
areas for naval combat would be the East China Sea, the Philippine Sea, which
lies between the West Pacific’s first and second island chains, and the South
China Sea. The destroyers’ choice to sail through the Strait must, therefore,
be seen from a political perspective.
The incident brings to
mind an earlier transit that took place on Nov. 22, 2007, when the aircraft
carrier USS Kitty Hawk and its support vessels headed toward Hong Kong for a
Thanksgiving Day port visit following a joint exercise with the Japan Maritime
Self-Defense Force, only to be informed that China had canceled its visit.
The USS Mustin
happened to have been one of the five ships in the USS Kitty Hawk’s carrier
strike group. Most unusually, the US side was notified about China’s decision
to deny entry to the ships by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army stationed in
Hong Kong, rather than through diplomatic channels.
Beijing immediately
reversed the decision and said that the Kitty Hawk would be allowed to visit
Hong Kong.
However, the Kitty
Hawk declined to accept Beijing’s insulting about-face and responded in kind by
heading north through the Strait on the pretext of avoiding the twin typhoons
Mitag and Hagibis, which were positioned on either side of the Philippines.
On its way through the
Strait the Kitty Hawk took the further step of dispatching some of the aircraft
it was carrying to conduct reconnaissance.
The sea conditions
threatened by the twin typhoons on that occasion were more severe than those
posed by Maria last week.
The incident did not
occur in isolation. China had already denied access to two US Navy minesweepers
to Hong Kong’s harbor to shelter from a typhoon and refuel, and it had denied
access to Hong Kong for resupplying by the destroyer USS James E. Williams and
a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III transport plane.
Following these
incidents, the US military announced through NATO channels that a Chinese
submarine had penetrated US Navy surveillance to approach the Kitty Hawk in the
Pacific Ocean.
This was in reference
to the exercise carried out by the US Navy and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense
Force before the Kitty Hawk passed through the Strait.
It is now difficult to
exactly grasp the atmosphere and reasons that led to swords being drawn at the
time.
However, what this
series of events show is that, despite the existence of a comprehensive
international system for assistance and rescue at sea, China, as one of the
signatories to the relevant treaty, could still callously renege on its
humanitarian responsibilities.
July 7 is the
anniversary of the 1937 Marco Polo Bridge Incident, which is generally seen as
the start of China’s war of resistance against Japan.
However, Beijing does
not recognize it as such. The date it chooses to commemorate is the Mukden
Incident of Sept. 18, 1931, based upon which it adds 14 years of war between
China and Japan, with the intention of renouncing the trammels of the San
Francisco Peace Treaty.
On the subject of
treaties, the announcement of the Treaty of Shimonoseki between Japan and the
Qing Empire in 1895 prompted the Triple Intervention by Russia, Germany and
France, which pressured Japan into undoing part of the Shimonoseki Treaty by
giving the Liaodong Peninsula back to China in exchange for a larger war
indemnity.
Apart from this, Japan
also engaged in mediation with various other countries. These exchanges
resulted in Japan’s agreement that, having annexed Taiwan under the Treaty of
Shimonoseki, it would not cede it to any other country, while the UK also said
that it would not occupy Taiwan.
Notably, Japan, based
on a Cabinet resolution, assured the consuls of nine nations — Russia, the UK,
Germany, France, Austria-Hungary, the US, Italy, the Netherlands and Korea —
that the Japanese imperial government recognized the whole of the Strait as
being open to navigation by the ships of all nations, and accordingly declared
that the Strait did not belong to Japan alone and was not under Japanese
jurisdiction.
It further stipulated
that the imperial government would not cede Taiwan or the Penghu Islands to any
other country.
This history shows that
Taiwan and the Strait have all along been issues of international concern
rather than a solely Chinese affair. However, China cannot be expected to
respect history and abide by the terms of treaties.
There is a
long-established legal basis for US Navy warships of more than 10,000 tonnes to
drop anchor and replenish at sea off the coast of Kaohsiung, and an agreement
to that effect was signed at the end of last year, ready to be acted upon at
any time.
Maybe that will ignite
the spark for the next clash between the US and China.
HoonTing is a
political commentator.
Translated by Julian
Clegg
Published on Taipei Times :
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2018/07/18/2003696875
Copyright © 1999-2018 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1999-2018 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved.
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行