The UK’s reaction
to protests in Hong Kong House of
Commons Library 20190614
Hong Kong is experiencing some of its largest
protests in recent years. The protesters,
who began demonstrating on Sunday 9 June, are
opposed to a proposed bill that will allow the extradition of individuals from Hong
Kong to mainland China. But the protests
also reflect wider
concerns that Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedoms are at risk. The UK Foreign
Affairs Committee has suggested China is moving away from a ‘one
country, two systems’ approach, towards ‘one
country, one system’.
Here, we look at how MPs and the UK Government have responded.
What is the
UK’s relationship with Hong Kong?
Hong Kong has a unique status. It is a Special Administrative Region
of the People’s Republic of China but has its own
legal system, judiciary and borders. Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy, its ‘one country,
two systems’ framework, was laid down in the 1984
Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong and preserved in the Basic
Law. This
Declaration is legally binding and remains in force. The Foreign
Affairs Committee said in 2015:
“The preservation of both the letter and the spirit of the Joint Declaration
is crucial to Hong Kong’s economic and business success, and the UK has both a legal right and a moral obligation to
monitor the implementation of the principles established in the treaty.”
Is the proposed
extradition law a breach of the Joint Declaration?
Helen Goodman MP suggests the proposed extradition law “constitute(s)
not just an erosion but a fundamental breach,” of the Declaration and “threaten(s)
the judiciary of Hong Kong.”
Foreign Office Minister Baroness Goldie said on 11 June: “We
do not believe that the proposed legislative changes in themselves are a breach
of the joint declaration.” However, the
previous day the Minister for Asia and the Pacific,
Mark Field, discussing wider concerns about the erosion of civil and political freedoms
in Hong Kong, said: “It
is clear that these events are becoming close to breaching not just the spirit
but the letter of the joint declaration.”
In 2016, the UK said the involuntary removal of British citizen Lee Po from
Hong Kong, to mainland China constituted
a ‘serious breach’ of the Declaration.
What does Parliament
think?
The unrest has drawn considerable interest from MPs, with three focused debates
taking place in the Commons in the week following the protests.
There is widespread concern, shared by the UK Government, that political and
civic freedoms in Hong Kong are coming under strain and the ‘one country, two systems’ model is being gradually eroded in
favour of China.
Catherine West MP asked an urgent
question on Monday 10 June. Discussing
the different legal systems used by China and Hong Kong, she warned: “The amendments to the extradition law would significantly
compromise the firewall that separates the sharply different systems.” Fiona
Bruce MP referenced Lord Patten’s comments (the last Governor of Hong Kong)
that the decision to exclude any extradition agreement between Hong Kong and mainland
China was a deliberate decision to protect the autonomy of Hong Kong.
Helen Goodman MP argued: “These laws constitute
not just an erosion but a fundamental breach of the Sino-British declaration and
the one country, two systems principle it enshrines. They threaten the judicial independence of Hong
Kong.” Peter
Grant MP asked the Government to ensure its
voice would not be silenced in favour of a trade deal with China. Steve Double
MP asked about the effect the proposed changes would have on British national (overseas)
passport holders.
Later that evening Alistair Carmichael MP led an adjournment
debate on UK policy towards China and Hong Kong. He described the
People’s Republic of China riding “roughshod” over the Joint Declaration.
Sir
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP described the
extradition Bill as “one of the worst threats” to Hong Kong’s legal system of
any legislation introduced so far. Richard Graham MP discussed the potential impact
on Hong Kong’s business community.
Emily Thornberry MP raised her concerns in response to the Minister’s oral
statement on 13 June. The shadow
Foreign Secretary cited the “steady erosion over recent years of compliance
with the joint UK-Sino declaration.” She
called on the Government to be firmer in their response to Chinese breaches of the
Joint Declaration. Her words were echoed
by Hannah Bardell MP, representing the SNP.
Members of the Lords also debated
the extradition bill on 11 June.
The Foreign Affairs Committee cites concern that Hong
Kong’s autonomy is at risk in an April
2019 report on China. The Committee had previously heard widespread concern
about the gradual erosion of the autonomy, rights and
freedoms guaranteed in the Joint Declaration
and Basic Law for its 2015 report on the UK’s
relations with Hong Kong.
What is the
Government’s position?
The Government has previously expressed its concern over the erosion of Hong
Kong’s autonomy on civil and political freedoms. The Foreign Office reports every six
months to Parliament on the implementation of the Joint Declaration. The FCO’s most recent
report discusses concerns about pressure from China to move Hong Kong towards
a “mainland
Chinese interpretation of civil and political freedoms.”
The Prime
Minister told MPs: “It is vital that the extradition arrangements in Hong Kong
are in line with the rights and freedoms that were set down in the Sino-British
joint declaration.”
Mark Field MP said the Government has repeatedly raised its concerns about
the proposed law with the Hong Kong Government and urged the latter to give “proper
consideration” to alternative solutions, “as
part of a comprehensive, ongoing consultation.” The Minister updated
the House again on 13 June after reports police used tear gas and rubber bullets
against protestors, calling on the authorities to ensure any response to protests
is “proportionate.”
The effect on UK citizens in Hong Kong was highlighted in a joint
statement on the proposed bill issued by the UK and Canadian Governments on 30 May. They said:
“We are concerned about the potential effect
of these proposals on the large number of UK and
Canadian citizens in Hong Kong, on business
confidence and on Hong Kong’s international
reputation.”
Further reading
What
are the Hong Kong protests about? The Guardian.
Hong
Kong Handover: 20 Year Anniversary, House of
Lords Library.
Hong
Kong: The final stages, House of Commons
Library (1996).
Louisa Brooke-Holland
is a Senior Library Clerk in the House of Commons
沒有留言:
張貼留言
請網友務必留下一致且可辨識的稱謂
顧及閱讀舒適性,段與段間請空一行