網頁

2014-07-12

Understanding of history is wrong by HoonTing 雲程 (2014.07.12) Taipei Times

JG's Comment
Somebody understands the role of the Free French for the 'exception to the rule' about the so-called civil affairs agreements by USMG.
This Korean analogy is also suitable and one should heed the sirens song of anti-Japanese propaganda.  The United States dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan but the CCP acts like they are going to do it.

However, they are too late.  China (ROC/PRC) did not defeat the Japanese in 1945.  The United States defeated the Japanese and then the Russians belatedly jumped on the bandwagon in May 1945.  The CCP insurgency benefited, and they were able to follow on the coattails of the Russian occupiers of Manchukuo.  The rest is history, but just don't ask PRC historians.  Instead consult the legal history of USMG for the subordinated role of the Free French and other issues of art 4(b), SFPT:

Civil Affairs Military Government: Selected Cases and Materials 

 【姊妹文章】

Understanding of history is wrong
By HoonTing 雲程 (2014.07.12)  Taipei Times

On Thursday last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) visited the Republic of Korea (ROK) for the first time since taking office.

China Central Television broadcast glowing reports about Xi’s invitation to South Korean President Park Geun-hye to organize a joint commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the war of resistance against Japan next year.

The two sides talked glibly about their desire to build a spiritual union of joint resistance to Japan, based on “a correct understanding of history,” but in fact, they are distorting the historical truth. This ruse can be exposed by asking one simple question: Did Korea really resist Japan?

Korea’s modern history can be compared to what happened in France during World War II.

Even though Nazi Germany occupied Paris, the government of Marshal Philippe Petain remained the legal government of France after moving its capital to Vichy.

However, Charles de Gaulle and others went to London and established the Free French Forces, which contributed to the Allies’ struggle against the Axis powers.

At first, the Free French Forces only served to make a political rallying cry and did not even amount to a government in exile. However, as the world situation changed, they eventually became recognized as the legal government of France.

In 1910, the Korean Empire, which had been a vassal state of China, signed a treaty with the Empire of Japan that merged the two empires into one.

The Korean royal family was absorbed into that of Japan. Japan was the successor state, and the Korean Peninsula became part of the Japanese empire, enjoying equal status with its other territories.

From then on, and notwithstanding the undeclared war that Japan waged on China from 1937 onward and its 1941 sneak attack on the US Navy base at Pearl Harbor, Korean subjects not only paid taxes to Japan, but also contributed to Japan’s Pacific War by serving in its armed forces. There were even Korean voluntary units in the Japanese military, and Koreans such as Crown Prince Euimin and Hong Sa-ik reached ranks as high as lieutenant general.

All ROK army chiefs of staff from 1948 to 1969 were former officers of the Japanese army, and the same is true of former ROK president Park Chung-hee.

Japan was the lawful government of the whole of Korea during World War II.

Considering these historical realities, what position is South Korea in to commemorate the anti-Japanese war?

Another aspect to consider is that a group of Korean nationalists set up a “Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea” in Shanghai in 1919.

On Oct. 10, 1938, the Korean Liberation Army (KLA) was set up in Wuhan, China. This force operated under the authority of the Political Training Board of China’s National Military Council, which also supplied its provisions.

In 1940, the Chinese Nationalist government based in Chongqing decided to provide assistance to the Korean provisional government and placed the KLA directly under the authority of China’s National Military Council, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dispatched military and political officers to guide its operations.

Following World War II, the ROK established a government and set up an independent state with the US’ backing.

Considering its history of dependence on China and the US, what justification does South Korea have for its claimed tradition of anti-Japanese resistance?

South Korea is not the only place where peripheral sinocentric thinking obscures historical reality. Taiwan’s governing authorities are holding an exhibition in the Zhongshan Hall — the former Taipei city hall — to mark the anniversaries of the 1937 Marco Polo Bridge Incident — China’s victory in its war of resistance against Japan — and Taiwan’s “retrocession” to China from Japanese colonial rule. The exhibition glorifies resistance and martyrdom, and it embodies the outlook of a victor nation. Since its real purpose is political mobilization, it cannot be expected to present a fair account of historical facts.

The historical reality is that, from 1895 onward, Taiwan was legally a territory of the Empire of Japan. Taiwanese people were imperial subjects who contributed to Japan’s war effort in the Pacific.

From a juridical point of view, Taiwanese people were all on the losing side in the Pacific War. Taiwan’s fate at the end of the war was to be cut off from Japan and occupied by the Allied forces, and its status remains undecided to this day.

Telling people to have a correct understanding of history on the one hand while stealthily distorting history on the other is just the kind of shameful behavior one can expect from hack politicians.
HoonTing is a political commentator.

Translated by Julian Clegg

3 則留言:

  1. Having just read your header, and feeling like hugging you. Please feel my pain. J. M. B.

    回覆刪除
  2. And then, noticing that your introduction is a Jeff Geer's quote. I have been following Mr. Geer's utterances in regard of the interim status of Taiwan since I stumbled upon: "Taiwan Status: From Grotius to WTO ( http://www.oocities.org/taiwanstatus/taiwanstatus.html ) way back in In 2005 or 2006.

    As an aside, while my bookmarks are momentarily out of my reach, a quick web search allowed me to retrieve the link above (as I recall, it used to be a "geocities" web address). And in the search result pane, I was pleased to to find prominently displayed your very own "200708202226 Taiwan Status: From Grotius to WTO ■Jeffrey Geer" (http://blog.xuite.net/hoonting/twblog/160091299-Taiwan+Status%3A+From+Grotius+to+WTO++■Jeffrey+Geer).

    Mr. Geer's framing of the issue through the legal lens of the civl affairs of occupied territories under paramount US military government is key in understanding the on-going interim status of the geographical area formerly known as Japanese Formosa and Pescadores.

    Now, you'll have to excuse me. I must read what you had to say of that issue so many years back. J. M. B.

    回覆刪除
  3. 重要參考
    http://disp.cc/b/Gossiping#!163-7TUH

    回覆刪除