網頁

2025-06-22

伊朗 OEM委託中共製造核彈的可能性有多少?



【雙魚之論】
The BBC report stated: It remains unclear how much damage the U.S. attack caused to these enrichment facilities or whether there were any casualties. Hassan Abedini, Iran’s deputy director of political affairs at state-run television, said Iran had already "evacuated" the three nuclear facilities in advance. He claimed on state television that Iran "did not suffer significant damage because the materials had already been relocated."
Following Following Israel’s attack on Iranian military bases and nuclear facilities, three Boeing 747 cargo planes operated by Luxembourg’s Cargolux landed in Iran over three days (June 14, 15, and 16). The report’s narrative is contradictory, with some claiming the planes continued to Luxembourg, while others say they did not, but it’s unclear whether the planes returned to China. The enriched uranium monitored by the IAEA has since gone missing.
Was the enriched uranium transferred to China via this route? The worst-case scenario is that Iran has commissioned China to manufacture nuclear boms, which could be the basis for Iran’s confidence in retaliation.

BBC的報導提及:目前尚不清楚美國的攻擊對這些濃縮設施造成了多大損害,或是否造成傷亡。伊朗國家廣播公司政治副主任阿貝迪尼(Hassan Abedini)表示,伊朗早已將這三處核設施「提前撤離」。他在國營電視台上表示,伊朗「並未遭受重大打擊,因為材料早已被轉移」。
以色列攻擊伊朗軍事基地與核設施之後,中國分3天(6/146/156/16)有3架波音有盧森堡貨運航空公司(Cargolux)操作的747貨機降落伊朗(報導的敘述是矛盾的,一說有續飛到盧森堡,一說沒有,但也沒說貨機是否回中國)。IAEA監控下的濃縮鈾至此不見蹤影。
濃縮鈾或透過此途徑被轉移到中國去了嗎?最壞的狀況是:伊朗委託中國製造核彈。這也是伊朗報復的底氣。

以色列突襲伊朗 33架神秘貨機自中國飛往中東    中央社 20250619

以色列13日對伊朗發動奇襲,隔天有架貨機自中國起飛,2,第2架飛機從一座沿岸城市啟航,16又有一架飛機升空,這次從上海起飛,3天來有3趟航班往西飛向中東

最新》伊朗近武器級高濃縮鈾下落不明 IAEA:目前無法掌握

英國「每日電訊報」(The Daily Telegraph)報導,數據顯示,這些航班每一架都沿著中國北部往西飛行,穿越哈薩克後南下進入烏茲別克與土庫曼,在接近伊朗時消失在雷達上

更增添神秘感的是,班機計畫顯示最終目的地是盧森堡,但這些飛機似乎並未飛到歐洲天空附近

在伊朗與以色列持續交戰之際,各界可能關切中國往伊朗方向運送何種物品

航空專家指出,這些航班使用的是波音(Boeing747型貨機,這類飛行通常是用來運送軍事裝備與武器,並常受僱來運送政府合約訂單。

英國艾克斯特大學(University of Exeter)講師吉塞利(Andrea Ghiselli)專研中國與中東和北非的關係。他說:「這些貨機無疑會引起極大關注,因為外界預期中國可能會採取行動來協助伊朗。」

中國與伊朗是戰略夥伴,主要立場是反對美國主導的世界秩序,並支持全球外交進入新的「多極階段」。

美情報評估:中俄伊朗北韓合作迅速增長構成新挑戰

中俄伊朗北韓結成「邪惡聯盟」 川普外交新挑戰

伊朗也是中國主要能源供應國之一,每天運送多達200萬桶石油,因此北京可能設法支持伊朗並讓局勢穩定下來,也就不足為奇了。

吉塞利說:「當前政權的垮台將造成嚴重打擊,可能會在中東製造很多不確定性,最終損及中國的經濟與能源利益。」

「此外,在伊朗,可能有很多人預期中國將提供某種協助。」

中國過去曾無視國際批評向伊朗供應物資,像是運送數以千計噸的彈道飛彈材料,而這些材料可讓伊朗用在研發核子武器上。

不過,在關鍵時刻,專家說北京可能會謹慎行事

每日電訊報指出,美國是以色列最堅定的盟友,如果中國直接涉入以伊衝突,可能會破壞中國穩定美中關係的任何機會。北京尚未從美中貿易戰中恢復過來。

吉塞利說:「中國軍事硬體的出現將使這一切變得不可能,尤其是已有一些人主張美國參戰,同時藉由攻擊伊朗來遏制中國。」

以色列國家安全研究所(Institute of National Security Studies)的中國與中東專家蓋林(Tuvia Gering)表示,儘管中國公開向德黑蘭運送防禦物資的「可能性依舊很低」,但「不應忽視這個可能性,且必須密切監控」。

除非經過獨立檢查,否則不太可能確切得知貨機載了哪些物品。根據可公開取得的航班數據在之後的航班中,部分飛機似乎從沿著土庫曼與伊朗邊界的同一個地區起飛,飛往盧森堡

營運這些飛機的盧森堡貨運航空公司(Cargolux表示,這些航班沒有使用伊朗空域,但該公司也沒有回答有關這些飛機運載何種物品的問題。

伊朗高層引用〈古蘭經〉報復美國人是否如法?

【雙魚之論】
https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/x2PBDYw

Q:伊朗最高領袖哈米尼(Ayatollah Ali Khamenei)顧問夏里亞馬達里(Hossein Shariatmadari)引用古蘭經:「你們無論在哪裡遇見他們,就殺死他們。」表達報復的意志。 此引述是真實的?似乎鼓勵殺戮,但應非宗教的原意。 說明原始經文的章節出處、文義脈絡,以免非穆斯林讀者誤解。

Grok:根據公開資訊,伊朗最高領袖哈米尼(Ayatollah Ali Khamenei)的顧問夏里亞馬達里(Hossein Shariatmadari確實曾被報導引用《古蘭經》中的一段經文:「你們無論在哪裡遇見他們,就殺死他們。」這段引述通常被認為出自《古蘭經》第2章(巴格勒章,Surah Al-Baqarah)第191節,原文為:

普丁:「溥天之下,莫非王土」;「率土之濱,莫非王臣」

【雙魚之論】
Putin’s claim—“All of Ukraine is ours,” “Wherever the Russian army goes is Russian soil,” and “Russians and Ukrainians are one people”—mirrors the CCP’s narrative on Taiwan with striking similarity. The CCP’s rhetoric, “Taiwan is part of China, not an inch can be separated,” invokes the ancient maxim, “Under the vast heavens, all is the king’s land,” and asserts, “All within the four seas are the king’s subjects,” concluding that “Taiwanese are Chinese” and should submit to Beijing’s rule.
Such rhetoric harks back to pre-medieval notions of territorial expansion and plunder as the aims of war.

普丁的言論:「整個烏克蘭都是我們的」、「俄軍所到之處,皆為俄土」、「俄烏同為一國人」,不就是與中共對台灣的言論完全一致嗎?中共有「台灣是中國的,一點都不能少」、「溥天之下,莫非王土」;「率土之濱,莫非王臣」,並總結為「台灣人就是中國人」理應接受北京統治。
這是中世紀以前的言論,是戰爭目的在擴張與掠奪。

普丁揚言「整個烏克蘭都我們的」 烏國外長:俄國沒有停火之意    CTWANT 20250622

快訊/川普:美軍成功打擊伊朗3核設施 NOWnews 20250622



【雙魚之論】
Fordow6B-2,攜帶12GBU-57
Natanz
Esfahan:潛艦發射30枚巡弋飛彈。

快訊/川普:美軍成功打擊伊朗3核設施    NOWnews 20250622

美國總統川普21日宣布,美軍順利完成對伊朗3處核設施的攻擊任務,目前所有戰機已經飛離伊朗領空

川普21日在自家社群平台「真實社群」(Truth Social)上發文,表示美軍「非常成功的襲擊」伊朗3處核設施,目標包括福爾多(Fordow)、納坦茲(Natanz)與伊斯法罕(Esfahan,目前所有戰機已離開伊朗領空。

川普在文中提到,美軍在主要目標福爾多核設施投下滿載的炸彈(full payload of bombs,「祝賀我們偉大的美國勇士們,「全世界沒有任何一支軍隊能做到這件事,現在正是追求和平的時刻!」

評:吉耐獅〈解放軍火箭與飛彈對台灣的威脅〉

China’s Military Threat to Taiwan: A Geopolitical Analysis

Guermantes Lailari, retired US Air Force Foreign Area officer, warns with his combat specialty in his article that by 2023, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had developed “systems destruction warfare” capabilities, enabling it to launch precision strikes on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure and wage psychological warfare at any moment. The CCP is now awaiting the alignment of complementary capabilities and an opportune moment to act.

In 2020, China and Iran signed a “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.” Drawing from Iran’s recent attack on Israel, the CCP’s potential invasion of Taiwan would likely commence with a multi-pronged, multi-wave saturation attack involving rockets, missiles, and drones launched simultaneously from multiple locations. Such an onslaught, characterized by its intensity and coordination, would overwhelm even the most advanced defense systems, including those of the United States. Inevitably, some missiles would penetrate defenses, causing significant physical damage and societal panic. The CCP’s vast population allows it to adopt a callous approach to human losses, prioritizing aggressive, high-cost tactics aimed at delivering an “overwhelming strike.” For Taiwanese civilians, survival would hinge on immediate sheltering or evacuation to weather the initial waves of attack.

For the CCP, a successful invasion of Taiwan would require a Blitzkrieg, or surprise attack, exploiting a moment of Taiwanese complacency. To achieve this, Beijing would likely adopt a slow, discreet military buildup, masking its preparations to avoid detection. The command center for rocket and missile operations is strategically located in Anhui Province, far from the frontline, while launch sites are distributed in a layered configuration: Fujian serves as the core, with Guangdong, Jiangxi, and Zhejiang forming a secondary ring, and more distant bases in Guangxi, Shandong, and Jilin constituting a third tier.

Analysts suggest that the CCP, Russia, Iran, and North Korea may have envisioned a coordinated global strategy: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine would distract the U.S. and Europe, potentially drawing Western forces to Eastern Europe; in this vacuum, Xi Jinping could launch an invasion of Taiwan and Okinawa, while North Korea crosses the 38th parallel to isolate Japan. Simultaneously, Iran and its proxies—such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Yemen’s Houthi rebels, and Hamas—would attack Israel. This synchronized operation was designed to stretch Western forces thin, creating tactical missteps that would tilt the balance in favor of the authoritarian bloc. However, the West’s resolute support for Ukraine and Israel’s aggressive counterstrikes against Hamas and Iran have disrupted this “arc of instability,” preventing Russia and China from leveraging Iran to connect their strategic flanks. As a result, Beijing has hesitated to initiate conflict over Taiwan.

In November 2023, Zhang Youxia, Vice Chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, visited Russia and met with Vladimir Putin, who concluded their discussion by expressing “gratitude for the strategic support from our Eastern friends during challenging times” and pledging “firm support on the Taiwan issue at critical moments.” In May 2025, Russian scholar Aleksandr Dugin, often dubbed “Putin’s brain,” publicly urged Beijing to “swiftly unify Taiwan by force,” warning that further delays would squander a strategic window. These statements underscore the plausibility of a coordinated plan among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea to ignite a global conflict.

Should Xi Jinping press the “missile button,” it would effectively trigger a world war. Launching such a conflict would require Beijing to be fully prepared for global repercussions. Yet, the odds of victory for Xi are slim, and one can only hope he possesses the wisdom to recognize the futility of a war that would harm others without benefiting China.

具有實戰軍事專業的作者吉耐獅在專文〈解放軍火箭與飛彈對台灣的威脅〉中提醒我們:中共在2023年已經具有「體系擊破戰」(systems destruction warfare)的能力,隨時可以對台灣發動攻擊關鍵設施與實施心理戰,現在等的是其他配合能力以及時機。

中共在2020年與伊朗簽署「全面戰略夥伴關係」,從此次伊朗攻擊以色列的模式看,中共侵略台灣將會是從多個地點以多種類型的火箭、飛彈與無人機,進行多波次、同時到達的飛彈飽和攻擊拉開序幕。

對這樣的飽和攻擊,包括美國在內的任何國家無法完全抵擋,必定有許多漏網飛彈落下,造成實質傷害或社會恐慌。中共人口太多,人命根本不成為戰術的顧慮。在「人命成本低」的思維下其戰術選擇更為激進,可能採取不計代價的「壓倒性打擊」策略。台灣一般平民就是要就地掩蔽或撤離,以躲過前幾波攻擊。

對中共而言,侵略台灣必須是出其不意的偷襲,在台灣鬆懈時下手。為此,中共準備會從外表看不出來時間會拉長,步調很緩慢。中共火箭攻擊的指揮部設在遠離「當面」的安徽省,攻擊發起基地採遠近搭配的多層次攻擊:以福建為中心,以廣東、江西、浙江為第二圈,第三圈又遠達廣西、山東、吉林。

外界認為「中俄伊朝」原本的想定是:俄羅斯攻擊烏克蘭,美歐無暇東顧,甚至抽掉兵力馳援烏克蘭在東亞真空下,習近平則發動侵略台灣與沖繩配合朝鮮越過38度線南下,日本被孤立中東則由伊朗、敘利亞擔任前鋒,加上約旦真主黨、葉門青年軍、哈瑪斯等對以色列發動攻擊。他們想以如此連動操作,讓西方戰術錯誤疲於奔命,以取得勝算。只是,美歐西方在烏克蘭沒有不孤注一擲的派兵、在中東代以允許以色列全面反擊哈瑪斯與現在的伊朗,讓地緣政治中所謂「不安定弧」的兩端的中俄,無法靠中央的伊朗連成一氣。結果是,中共發動對台戰爭遲疑至今。

202311月中共中央軍委副主席張又俠訪問俄羅斯,會見普丁時普丁最後一句話提醒習近平「感謝東方朋友在特殊時期的戰略支持,關鍵時刻我們也會在台海問題上給予堅定支持」。20255月間,有「普丁大腦」稱號的俄羅斯學者杜金(Aleksandr Dugin),公開呼籲北京「儘快武統台灣」,他認為一再拖延只會痛失時機。顯見前述四國聯手發動全球戰爭的想定並非空穴來風。

習近平的飛彈按鈕一旦按下,就是世界大戰了。習近平要有此準備,才能發動戰爭。這場戰爭,習近平一定會輸,希望他能有足夠智慧想清楚:損人不利己的狀況。

星期專論 解放軍火箭與飛彈對台灣的威脅 吉耐獅(Guermantes Lailari)@自由 20250622

解放軍火箭與飛彈對台灣的威脅    吉耐獅(Guermantes Lailari)@自由 20250622

最近有一位外國同事問我:「要距離中國人民解放軍火箭軍(PLARF)可能攻擊台灣的目標多遠,才能夠稱得上安全?」本文將嘗試回答這個問題,並協助居住在台灣的人們更深入瞭解他們所面對的威脅。

為什麼瞭解解放軍/火箭軍的打擊策略如此重要?

共軍「體系破擊戰」 鎖定領導階層

根據美國智庫「蘭德公司」(RAND)的分析,中國人民解放軍的「體系破擊戰」(systems destruction warfare著重於癱瘓對手的作戰體系,具體作法是鎖定其網絡,尤其是領導階層、指揮管制(C2)節點、感測器與資訊中樞等

二五年五月十五日,美國印太司令部司令帕帕羅(Samuel Paparo)上將,在「塞多納論壇」(Sedona Forum)發表主題演說時指出,早在二三年,解放軍就已經具備相關能力,可以執行中國國家主席習近平要求最遲在二二七年攻佔台灣的指令。帕帕羅上將特別指出,解放軍已經達成習近平對於二二七年所設定的飛彈與太空作戰能力指標。對台灣的網路攻擊能力也已準備就緒。解放軍隨時都可以迅速運用這三種能力。與此同時,北京也持續完善其他能力,以迎合習近平提出的二二七年入侵指標。

2025-06-21

台海兵推 「控制組」先失控



【雙魚之論】
從這報導來看,是控制組的問題:問題不明確。

台海兵推「台灣組」挨批落漆險集體走人!內幕曝光 將領急勸:忍一下    鏡週刊 20250620

台北政經學院日前舉辦民間兵棋推演記者會,加起來超過40顆星星的台日美退役上將齊聚進行台海防衛兵推,但當中的「台灣組」遭批表現落漆,引發討論。不過據悉,主因是初始的「想定」不夠明確,才讓台灣組難以回答,退將們被批無能有苦說不出,甚至差點集體缺席隔日兵推。

美國太平洋艦隊司令:台灣納入「嚇阻任務」應對中國威脅 自由 20250620

【雙魚之論】
U.S. Deterrence Strategy Analysis
Admiral Stephen Koehler
, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, stated unequivocally during a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) that Taiwan falls within the scope of the United States’ deterrence mission.
The Role of U.S. Navy Commanders
A thorough examination of the U.S. Navy’s historical evolution reveals that, from Commodore Perry to the global voyages of the Great White Fleet, fleet or expeditionary force commanders have never been mere tacticians focused solely on military affairs. On the contrary, they are frequently vested with diplomatic authority, enabling them to articulate and execute U.S. strategic and political objectives. Accordingly, Admiral Koehler’s assertion that Taiwan is included in the U.S. deterrence strategy clearly reflects a consensus policy of the White House and the broader U.S. government.
Misconceptions Among Domestic Scholars
Some domestic scholars contend that the Taiwan Defense TTX2025 with retired U.S. generals represent only military perspectives, suffering from narrow vision and insufficient authority. However, this view overlooks the fact that military expertise is a specialized discipline, requiring years of rigorous training, and that the integration of military and diplomatic competencies is a fundamental aspect of U.S. military leadership development. Dismissing the interconnectedness of defense and diplomacy while undervaluing military professionalism reveals these scholars’ own misjudgments and cognitive biases.
U.S. Military Deployments and Deterrence Posture
According to reports, in early to mid-June, the movements of U.S. naval assets—including the aircraft carriers USS Nimitz (in South China Sea) and USS George Washington (in Western Pacific), as well as the amphibious assault ships USS Tripoli (en route to Sasebo) and USS America (en route to Australia)—stood in stark contrast to China’s dual-carrier exercises in the Philippine Sea. These deployments not only demonstrate the U.S. military’s vigilant deterrence posture but also underscore its operational reach, which significantly surpasses that of its adversary.
美國嚇阻戰略分析
美國太平洋艦隊司令斯蒂芬·科勒(Stephen Koehler)在智庫CSIS發表演講時明確指出,台灣納入美國嚇阻任務的範圍。
美國海軍司令的角色
深入了解美國海軍的發展歷程便可知:從培里司令到大白艦隊的全球航行時代,美國艦隊或遠征軍司令從不僅僅是只懂軍事的莽夫。相反,他們往往在出發前便被賦予外交授權,能夠發表並執行美國的戰略與政治任務。因此,科勒司令關於美國嚇阻戰略涵蓋台灣的發言,顯然反映了白宮及整個政府的共識政策。
國內學者的誤判
國內部分學者認為,美國退役將軍參與的兵棋推演僅代表軍事層面,存在視野狹隘與層級不足的局限。然而,不僅軍事是門專業,需要多年培育才能有成,軍事與外交結合,更是美軍將官養成的基本資歷。切割國防外交的一體性並貶低軍事專業的觀點恰恰暴露了學者自身的誤判與認知偏狹。
美軍部署與嚇阻態勢
根據報導,六月上中旬,美國航母「尼米茲號」(USS Nimitz,位於南海)、「喬治·華盛頓號」(USS George Washington,位於西太平洋),以及兩棲攻擊艦「的黎波里號」(USS Tripoli,前往佐世保)與「美國號」(USS America,前往澳洲)的動態,與中共在菲律賓海的雙航母演練形成對比。這不僅展現了美軍緊密監視的嚇阻態勢,更彰顯其行動範圍遠遠超對手之上。
結論
科勒司令的嚇阻論述,既非越權之舉,亦非毫無根據的誇口,而是有堅實事實支撐的戰略表態。

美國太平洋艦隊司令:台灣納入「嚇阻任務」應對中國威脅    自由 20250620

美國太平洋艦隊司令柯勒(Stephen Koehler)上將指出,面對中國的步步進逼,台灣已經被納入太平洋艦隊的「嚇阻任務」(mission of deterrence)一環。

冗員太多 川普裁員VOA的85%人力

【雙魚之論】
As U.S. government-funded broadcasters, media outlets such as Voice of America, Radio Free Asia, and Radio Free Europe should be dedicated to promoting the values and strengths of the United States and the free world. However, from an efficiency standpoint, former President Trump argued that these outlets heavily rely on news sources from other media, indicating staffing redundancies that require streamlining. More critically, their content often includes significant criticism of the U.S. system, raising concerns about inadvertently promoting the agendas of hostile powers, thus making staff reductions imperative.
From my personal experience, Voice of America has long neglected the rights of Traditional Chinese users by offering only Simplified Chinese versions. Despite years of written complaints, these efforts have been futile. Even when Traditional Chinese versions were occasionally introduced, they were removed within days, with the Simplified Chinese version consistently prioritized. This pattern, persisting for years, suggests that Voice of America employs an excessive number of Chinese staff and editors who align with Beijing’s strategic goal of “telling China’s story well,” exploiting their superiors’ lack of Chinese language proficiency to deceive them.
Such a Voice of America urgently requires staff cuts and reform.

作為美國政府資助的電台,如美國之音、自由亞洲電台、自由歐洲電台等傳媒機構本應致力於宣傳美國及自由世界的價值與優勢。然而,川普從效率角度出發,認為這些機構大量引用其他媒體的新聞來源,顯示其人力冗餘,需進行精簡。更重要的是,這些電台內部存在大量攻擊美國體制的內容,恐有為敵對勢力宣傳之嫌,因此裁員勢在必行。
就個人經驗而言,美國之音長期忽視繁體中文使用者的權益,僅提供簡體中文版本。多年來,儘管多次投書抗議,均無效果;即便偶爾推出繁體中文版本,數日後又被刪除,持續獨尊簡體中文。此種情況反覆多年,顯示美國之音內部存在過多聽命於北京、致力於「講好中國故事」戰略目標的中文雇員與編輯,利用長官不懂中文的弱點進行欺瞞。
這樣的美國之音,確實亟需裁員整頓。

USAGM美國之音正式解僱639名員工】    新唐人 20250621